NAOJ GW Elog Logbook 3.2
The material of YVO4 was simulated using comsol. The heat distribution pattern was obtained. I then computed the retardation of each point in 3D and then multplied the Jones matrix of each data point along the depth of the plate. This resulted in a cumulative retardation of the plate. The Fig 1 shows the heat distribution of the plate, and Fig 2 is the retardation map obtained. The relevant specs are mentioned on the image.
The retardation was calculated assuming beam propagation along c axis of the crystal. Also, during retardation calculation I consider both the change in retardation due to heat and thermal expansion.
If you want to embed images, you can do so by following these steps
1. Upload the image.
2. Select Plane text in the Choose editor menu.
3. Copy and paste the following line and change alt, src, height, and width.
4. Finally, select CKEditor (HTML) to embed the image.
The line to add is
<img alt="Fig-1" src="https://gw-elog.mtk.nao.
where this 'https://gw-elog.mtk.nao.
The purpose is that pictures in comments should be visible in the main entry.
The line to add is
<img alt="Fig-1" src="https://gw-elog.mtk.nao.
where this 'https://gw-elog.mtk.nao.
The purpose is that pictures in comments should be visible in the main entry.
The spectrum of laser modulation at 2.5Vp-p from moku, with harmonics.
Yesterday, I had noted the PSD units of voltage. As the ratio power is Outputpower/Input power, I redid measurements to take into account only Vp-p. In the following plot you can see the saturation after 2.5V or so. ]
[Kohara-san, Marc]
The mirrors initially planned to be used for this cavity disappeared...
I found some other possible ones in the large dessicators : PSCM99.99Q25.4C08-r300-Y1-1D-2.8D and PSCM98Q25.4C08-r300-Y1-1D-2.8D
It is custom made by Sigma Koki who refuses to tell me their parameters if I can not guess the purchaser...
After some times, I found also some partial information about them. They were purchased around 2013 and characterized in october 2013.
They have HR reflectivity of either 99.99% and 98% (to be checked) and AR reflectivity of 0.1%.
With Kohara-san, we used the motorized microscope MITAKA NH-3SP to measure their radius of curvature.
We measureed HR RoC of about 0.3m and AR RoC flat with a wedge.
HR side is where the arrow on the barrel is pointing towards.
The arrow itself seems to be aligned with the wedge and minimal thickness of the wedge is close to the arrow.
There are also some characterization sheets that I will upload to the wiki.
Detailled measurement are below.
The second line of the japanese characters is the RoC in um.
For each component, except if indicated otherwise, the first measurement is HR side (arrow pointing up) and second one AR side (arrow pointing down)
__________________________________
XY cross measurement 1000um pitch XY 10000um range 99_1 ���S���W: X=5832.79 Y=8090.89 Z=325044.694 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: 300974.56 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 3.47 ���S���W: X=574928.39 Y=486026.38 Z=-2147483.648 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: -2147483.65 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 1.41 99_2 ���S���W: X=9413.71 Y=3922.84 Z=324641.935 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: 300517.78 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 3.73 ���S���W: X=343179.78 Y=-88975.30 Z=-2147483.648 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: -2147483.65 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 2.80 98_1 ���S���W: X=9824.51 Y=5359.10 Z=327495.068 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: 303392.40 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 6.60 ���S���W: X=11790.56 Y=810305.67 Z=-2147483.648 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: -2147483.65 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 1.32 98_2 spherical surface 1000um pitch ���S���W: X=8820.63 Y=11065.34 Z=328849.728 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: 304724.39 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 9.54 pitch 100um ���S���W: X=8810.48 Y=11089.98 Z=329527.916 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: 305403.18 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 29.23 45degree rotation ���S���W: X=11973.85 Y=15667.13 Z=326057.078 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: 301946.05 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 3.99 1000um pitch ���S���W: X=48816.30 Y=278499.69 Z=-2147483.648 ���̔��a�i�ʂ��j: -2147483.65 �^���x�i�ʂ��j: 4.06
The EOM usually will not be perfect. I tried to speculate the voltage for the EOM at hand. The calibration measurement of the EOM was done by manufacturer at 1310 nm.
Vpi = 508V @1310 nm
Vpi = a * lambda + c (can fit the voltage by sine)
Given formula by manufaturer; Vpi = 0.361 * Lambda - 23.844.
Vpi at lambda = 1310 shoud be , Vpi = 449V
But, since its different, I try to calculate what Vpi should be at 1064nm.
for Vpi=508,c==23.844, a should 0.406. Therfore at L = 1064, Vpi=408V
for Vpi=508,a=0.361, c should 35.09. Therfore at L = 1064, Vpi=419V.
The constant are determined by the crystal size, and they can't be revealed by the manufacturer.
So, we need not just 365V, but around 419-408V, for maxmimum modulation depth.
[Marc, Takahashi]
A new optical table was delivered and installed in the BIGFOOT labspace.
It is 2000*900 from Nihon Boushin.
[Marc, Michael M. , Shalika]
We removed the previous birefringence readout from the imaging unit which was using PBS and several optics installed on a small breadboard.
Instead, we now use Thorlabs polcam that was aligned to the input beam.
We tuned the input QWP/HWP to reach circular polarization, then installed and aligned a polarizer to inject pure linear polarization.
While testing the polarizer alignment vs rotation, the power control HWP was mistakenly rotated sending up to about 300mW to the polcam.
It disabled itself crashing the vi but could be somehow recovered after sometimes.
It seems that the camera is still able to properly read polarization (at least linear) as the read value corresponds to the expected polarizer rotation.
This issue arised because when 2 motorized rotator controller are connected to the pc, only one is detected... For safety, after recovering the appropriate input power, we disconnected the power controller HWP.
[Marc, Michael M., Shalika]
Note for future operation of any of the VI is that now only the new added powermeter is recognized by the VI.
If the one in transmission of the sample is used, it takes priority over the new one (likely because it becomes the number '0' powermeter recognized by the pc).
For now the transmission powermeter is turned off.
[Marc, Michael M., Shalika]
The initial implementation of this feature was made by removing the waiting time of the vi.
It led to visible artifact during the motion of the sample.
It was restored to the usual 500ms and resolved the issue.
Somehow, the VI is now faster than before to acquire each point.
Previously the EOM was rotated by 45 degree, and then input polarization was along x axis of lab frame. The modulation depth observed was not that good. This was because the input polarization was parallel to the crystal. The crystal is already rotated by 45degree inside the housing of EOM. So, we we should either rotate the input polarization by 45deg or the EOM. I took the path of least action and rotated the polarization by 45deg using a polarizer.
The input polarization was tuned to become circular using QWP, HWP. Then polarizer was installed in rotator mount. I inject for now a 45degree rotated polarization. The power of input pol is now 0.86mW.
The transmission of EOM is 0.85mW. So, transmision is around 98%.
I then apply modulation at 189.969KHz, using a noninverting amplifier circuit from Fig 1. Previously I was using Inv amplifier design, but the matched impedance with moku halves the input voltage. So, I went for a high impedance circuit design using Noninv amplifier. I took into account the losses in the circuit during simulation, which predicts the maximum voltage I have is 286V. I want to install transformer after opamp, to amplify more. If you are impedance matched your circuit will always act as voltage divider circuit, and the input voltage will be halved. A high-z circuit helps achieve no drop in input voltage of the circuit. For our circuit, to ensure minimal reflection, the cable should not be long (1km).
The modulation is observed after a polarizer in cross polarizer configuration, with the input polarizer. The response is shown in Fig 2. The data was noted from the spectrum analzyer as PSD units, Vp-p/sqrt(Hz). I then multplied this value to convert to power using coversion factor of photodiode.
My circuit seems to have saturated after 2.5Vp-p input or so. I need to investigate this. But, the response of the modulation doesn't change after 2.5V.
I use the power ratio to compute the maximum voltage I am reaching now, and it's around 255V.
Data is saved in 'C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\EOM 2D\EOM 1\Characteristics_20250304.txt'
Also, I observed the change in the oscilloscope of values duirng modulation and without modulation. The mean value of voltage remains same as 2.15V. The peak to peak value is the only one which changes.
The spectrum of laser modulation at 2.5Vp-p from moku, with harmonics.
Yesterday, I had noted the PSD units of voltage. As the ratio power is Outputpower/Input power, I redid measurements to take into account only Vp-p. In the following plot you can see the saturation after 2.5V or so. ]
Hsun-Chung, Chien-Ming, Michael
The infrared probe and green pump are both mode matched into the OPO cavity. The green steering mirror closest to the OPO was replaced with a PZT phase shifter at 45 degree incidence, like the one in TAMA.
The PDH locking setup was constructed. Originally we were going to use 40 MHz modulation onto the IR probe beam to lock the OPO, but since the IR probe is injected into the high reflectivity M2 mirror, the amount of IR coupling is quite low and the PDH signal is small. Instead we clone the 40 MHz sidebands onto the green beam using the SHG (or rather, SFG - sum frequency generation) and can get good sideband amplitude.
To lock the cavity we planned to use the grey Mokulab from TAMA FC. The Mokulab output was sent to a really old 33 dB RF power amplifier (it has an analogue dial), which works. However, the grey mokulab input ports are not working properly. This was tested by sending a function generator input into the IN ports and checking oscilloscope and spectrum analyzer functions.
So, we need either a working Mokulab unit or PDH locking hardware (currently we do not have sufficient equipment for 40 MHz RF amplification). A long time ago we were using a Red Mokulab in ATC (I think this was purchased using my old JSPS funding or Matteo Kiban A) which seems to have moved on to another experiment right now.
Hsun-Chung and Chien-Ming left today since their flight tomorrow is very early. Since everything is aligned and mode matched, once we get the PDH locking equipment I should be able to do the OPO nonlinear gain test (IR probe amplification and deamplification from a slowly phase modulated green pump injection, at different levels of green power) by myself and infer the threshold power, which is an important number for the squeezer performance.
June-Gyu, Gyo-ik, Hsun-Chung, Chien-Ming, Michael
The local oscillator was aligned to the "mode cleaner" (just a single mode polarization maintaining fiber).
The OPO mirrors were cleaned with First Contact after being glued to the new mounts.
It seems one of the ports on the 3 port HVD in the ATC clean booth might be damaged.
We want to perform the nonlinear gain test so we will need to get the OPO PDH signal. We have a mokulab module in TAMA but I need to find the ipad from somewhere.
The TMP in the west end has stoped in error E050 (Excess tenperature). I found the FAN for the TMP was not working (broken). I stoped the DRY pump as well.
Hsun Chun, Chien Ming, Michael
The incoupling mirror was glued to the new mount.
For constructing the path of the local oscillator to the homodyne, I had to take 4 XY lens mounts from the speedmeter drawers.
I replaced the RP (2015) for theTMP with new DRY pump (NeoDry30G) in the west end. The TMP is running with the DRY pump now.
The TMP in the west end has stoped in error E050 (Excess tenperature). I found the FAN for the TMP was not working (broken). I stoped the DRY pump as well.
The maximum Transmisison factor achieved with this circuit was 0.86 or 86%. I can calculate what is roughly the maximum voltage I provided.
Vpi = 306.26V from elog 3750
Vpi * asin(sqrt(0.86)) / 1.5 = 284 V at resonant freq of 189.13 kHz.
Considering the length of transmission line I have as l = 35cm, of R0=50 ohm, I can compute the stray capacitance of the EOM due to the tranmission line as follows:
According to theory written in "Optical Electronics" by Yariv, for a amplitude modulation EOM
TransmissionOut/ Input = sin^2( pi/2 * V/Vpi)
If I can properly, obtain my transfer function measurement then I can very well define my V. Hence, I can estimate the fit parameters better. Also, the quality of fit can then be better estimated by seeing if we have this pi/2 factor inside the sin square function or not.
Currently I am using the voltage input to RF circuit, and not the voltage across the EOM electrodes.
The PCI PC was updated, to be with windows 11. Previously the C drive was full because windows 10 is just bulky. Now the C drive has around 100gb left. This has made the PC much faster than before. It is not buffering anymore.