R&D (FilterCavity)
YuhangZhao - 23:41, Thursday 19 November 2020 (2285)
Comparison of Thorlabs PSD (with amplification) and HAMAMATSU PSD (without amplification) for INPUT mirror oplev

To see the possibility of using HAMAMATSU PSD for INPUT mirror oplev, I did the comparison between Thorlabs PSD (with amplification) and HAMAMATSU PSD (without amplification) for INPUT mirror oplev.

The comparison result is shown in the attached figure.

Upper figure: (for INPUT pitch) REF0 is INPUT oplev spectrum with Thorlabs PSD. REF 2 Thorlabs PSD electronic noise after amplification. REF 4 INPUT oplev spectrum with HAMAMATSU 04 PSD. Red line: HAMAMATSU 04PSD electronic noise.

Lower figure: (for INPUT yaw)REF0 is INPUT oplev spectrum with Thorlabs PSD. REF 2 Thorlabs PSD electronic noise after amplification. REF 4 INPUT oplev spectrum with HAMAMATSU 04 PSD. Red line: HAMAMATSU 04PSD electronic noise.

It can be seen that Thorlabs PSD has a bit better SNR. This better SNR is proven to come from the amplification (proved in elog2114).

Images attached to this report
2285_20201119155941_inputcomp.png