KAGRA MIR (Polarization)
MarcEisenmann - 13:52, Friday 06 September 2024 (3714)
qwp birefringence measurement

I realigned the beam that should now propagate along (x,y) = with 0.06 deg deviation.

I reinstalled the polarization camera, updated the labview vi and found the qwp sample (previously measured by Hugo) as (x,y) = 322.75,156.1

measurement will be done with 50 averages/medians

calibration map with 1 mm step and 3 mm radius

measurement map with 2 mm step and 9 mm radius

0deg  :

no sample : Thu, Sep 5, 2024 3-07-56 PM

sample : Thu, Sep 5, 2024 3-22-20 PM

15deg

no sample :Thu, Sep 5, 2024 4-19-34 PM

sample : Thu, Sep 5, 2024 4-26-27 PM

30 deg

no sample : Thu, Sep 5, 2024 4-45-38 PM

sample : Thu, Sep 5, 2024 4-52-12 PM

45deg

no sample : Thu, Sep 5, 2024 5-15-55 PM

sample : Thu, Sep 5, 2024 5-21-25 PM

60 deg

no sample : Thu, Sep 5, 2024 5-43-24 PM

sample : Thu, Sep 5, 2024 6-05-04 PM

75 deg

no sample : Fri, Sep 6, 2024 1-47-12 PM

sample : Fri, Sep 6, 2024 1-53-11 PM

Comments related to this report
MarcEisenmann - 18:47, Friday 06 September 2024 (3715)

There was issue with 0deg calibration file (empty..)

Using other files, together with a condition of Jones matrix homogeneity of theta_r > pi - 0.01 and otherwise using semi-homogeneous case for eta < eta_max we can still get the attached plot of the QWP efffective retardation.

With these conditions we use the couples (15/30, 15/45, 30/45).

The result is compatible with LC measurement (88.5 +/-0.6 deg) and with vendor specifications.

I'll repeat the measurements with 0deg input polarization and also compute Jones matrix, full diattenuation/retardation and rotation.

MarcEisenmann - 10:55, Monday 09 September 2024 (3718)

after waiting about 1h to let the laser stabilized :

0deg

no sample : Mon, Sep 9, 2024 10-26-56 AM

sample : Mon, Sep 9, 2024 10-32-56 AM

Adding these maps we now have (0/30, 0/45,0/60,15/30,15/45,30/45) couples and effective retardation attached to this entry.