LOG-IN
Displaying reports 1-20 of 3284.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
BIGFOOT (cell birefringence)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 18:30, Sunday 12 January 2025 (3879)Get code to link to this report
Comment to new kind of hydrogel measurement (Click here to view original report: 3864)

The analysis of the results give the following results. 

Non-image files attached to this comment
BIGFOOT (Readout)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 19:09, Friday 10 January 2025 (3878)Get code to link to this report
Trial to characterize EOM

On the eom path, made the laser linear using HWP and QWP (±0.01º). This was measured using polcam. The polcam was then removed. The power after this stage was 1.44mW.

Then aligned PD on the transmission path.

Then added polarizer infront of PD and the setup was configured to be in cross polarization configuration.

The characterization will be done using PD because the polcam can't see kHz modulation.

The test is being done to check how much modulation can be provided by the circuit.

BIGFOOT (Readout)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 18:07, Friday 10 January 2025 (3873)Get code to link to this report
Beam requirement for EOM

The aperture of EOM is 2mm diameter. So, the beam radius should be smaller than 1mm.

The power density requirement is <4W/mm2.

The current beam characteristics are shown using lens F=100 in Fig 1 and F=50, -50 mm in Fig 2. from elog 3754

If we keep input power of around 1.5mW, both of the lens system would be fine to implement.

The 100 mm lens was kept at 101.5cm.

Tbh I didn't quite understand why the 100 mm lens was removed (in elog 3563). From the beam characteristics it seems we can achieve the requirement on both power density and beam size using one lens and in less space. I feel its much better to use less lens and keep stuff in compact space, unless there is some reasonable issue that needs to be taken into account. If the space is compact we can fit both EOM in reasonable space, without consuming the entire length of the table.

In Fig 3 I have added position for both EOM and the required lens for it.(will add the plot in a shortwhile)

Images attached to this report
3873_20250110063749_completebeambeforeandafterf100mm.png 3873_20250110063753_completebeambeforeandafter2f50mm.png
BIGFOOT (General)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 17:28, Friday 10 January 2025 (3876)Get code to link to this report
Lightwave laser from tama input

The laser was tested to see if it can be switched on or is dead (the asset label says 1996). Apparently it's not dead. It's on bigfoot table now, and is intended to be used.

Images attached to this report
3876_20250110092614_20250110172628.jpg
BIGFOOT (Readout)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 15:22, Friday 10 January 2025 (3875)Get code to link to this report
Comment to RF ckt with EOM (Click here to view original report: 3872)

The TF of the 2nd EOM was also measured. It is shown in Fig 1 and zoomed in Fig 2. 

During measurement

Attenuation using cable (10x = 20dB) + attenuation using Moku(5x = 13.9dB)

There is a slight difference of 0.7kHz in the resonant frequency of both eom. This can be tuned using variable capacitor. 

Also the desired resonant frequency was at around 0.3MHz, during design. But now during measurement its at 0.17MHz. 

Images attached to this comment
3875_20250110072155_mokuopampeom2tf20250109.png 3875_20250110072202_mokuopampeom2zoomedtf20250109.png
BIGFOOT (Readout)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 20:06, Thursday 09 January 2025 (3872)Get code to link to this report
RF ckt with EOM

I measured the TF of ckt in Fig 1 with EOM. 

The TF obtained using Moku is in Fig 2 and Fig 3. I will need to use a tunable capacitor to match the resonant frequency to the desirable one. 

In any case, the circuit looks good now. The measurement has been taken with HV probe with attenuation factor of 10. Also the range on moku was 50Vp-p, which implies that there was 5x attenuation inside moku as well. (Attenuation using cable (10x = 20dB) + attenuation using Moku(5x = 13.9dB))

Fig 4 and Fig 5 is how circuit looks now. 

Images attached to this report
3872_20250109120305_screenshot20250109200227.png 3872_20250109120548_mokuopampeomtf20250109.png 3872_20250109120552_mokuopampeomzoomedtf20250109.png 3872_20250109121037_20250109201033.jpg 3872_20250109121048_20250109201029.jpg
Comments related to this report
ShalikaSingh - 15:22, Friday 10 January 2025 (3875)

The TF of the 2nd EOM was also measured. It is shown in Fig 1 and zoomed in Fig 2. 

During measurement

Attenuation using cable (10x = 20dB) + attenuation using Moku(5x = 13.9dB)

There is a slight difference of 0.7kHz in the resonant frequency of both eom. This can be tuned using variable capacitor. 

Also the desired resonant frequency was at around 0.3MHz, during design. But now during measurement its at 0.17MHz. 

BIGFOOT (Readout)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 19:37, Thursday 09 January 2025 (3871)Get code to link to this report
Comment to OpAmp Transfer function for RF ckt (Click here to view original report: 3870)

Things left to change in the circuit

Use ceramic capacitor for RF part.

Use electrolytic for power line. 

Use high imepdance cable to measure the TF with EOM (not the normal cable)

BIGFOOT (Readout)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 19:29, Thursday 09 January 2025 (3870)Get code to link to this report
OpAmp Transfer function for RF ckt

I will be using an Opamp to match impedance the input impedance of my circuit with Moku output. 

Previously I was using a resistor of 1Mohm. This caused an issue where the circuit gain was depleted at high frequency, because it overrid the imepdance of Opamp (the opamp impedance is in 1M ohm range, so using a 1M ohm resistor affects the opamp TF). This issue could be seen in elog 3860.

Also, just to be sure, I am using a newly purchased Opamp. 

The voltage regulators, LM7815, 7915 are being used to take input of 18V and give opamp supply of 15V. (self reminder- I need to change the capacitor here to electrolytic ones)

I changed the Opamp circuit as shown in Fig 2.

The opamp part is good now. The TF can be seen in Fig 3. There is a uniform gain of factor 5 ish (1000/220 for inverting opamp). Hence around 12dB. 

Images attached to this report
3870_20250109112950_screenshot20250109192155.png 3870_20250109113006_mokuopamptf20250109.png
Comments related to this report
ShalikaSingh - 19:37, Thursday 09 January 2025 (3871)

Things left to change in the circuit

Use ceramic capacitor for RF part.

Use electrolytic for power line. 

Use high imepdance cable to measure the TF with EOM (not the normal cable)

General (General)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 12:46, Thursday 09 January 2025 (3868)Get code to link to this report
Borrowed 1.5um optics and laser from ATC

I have borrowed 1.5um laser and the related optics that were stored by Rishabh in the dessicator. I have taken permission from Aso sensei about this. They will be in tama now. 

Images attached to this report
3868_20250109035519_20250109115236.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
MichaelPage - 02:49, Sunday 29 December 2024 (3867)Get code to link to this report
Recovery of squeezing with no glitches

I recovered squeezing and saw that the noise floor was completely stable with no glitches. The noise floor level is not so good, only -5 dB, and there is some excess noise in the spectrum from probably mode cleaner motion. Also the green path is still behaving strangely. Still, I saw ~ 5dB squeezing for about 10 minutes continuously with only stationary noise, which is a small relief to close out the year at least. The two main problems now are green lock stability and IRMC power level noise.

Piece by piece details

Second harmonic generator

SHG electronics have some weird behaviour. For a while the appropriate lock threshold has been about 10x what the transmission spectrum on the oscilloscope would suggest. Actually right now it's at the maximum of the range. I guess there is a gain in there somewhere that needs to be turned down. Also the SHG servo gain has some very annoying behaviour - it seems the ideal gain is about 1.5 to 2, however, sometimes on lock it will have a weird 250 Hz oscillation. This is a separate issue from the usual high gain oscillation of a generic control loop, which happens at gain ~ 2.5-3. The 250 Hz oscillation can sometimes be made to disappear by turning the gain a little bit up or down, but sometimes it also just loses lock. This also sometimes causes unlock of the SHG.

Green mode cleaner and Mach Zender

As mentioned a few times before, the green mode cleaner will arbitarily switch demodulation phase from I to Q and unlock the green path. This is now the main issue preventing long term measurement of squeezing. Specifically, I optimized the demod phase to I-phase and then proceeded with squeezing. The GRMC outputs TEM00 at 25 mW as usual, and from the CC error signal it produces the nominal level of nonlinear gain. But then after some time it unlocks, and looking at the error signal immediately after shows that it has gone completely to Q-phase. After some time it drifts a bit and 10 minutes later it's at I guess halfway between I and Q phase. I don't really know whether it's optical or electronic. I tried turning the green phase shifter PZT offset all the way up to 150 V (usually sits at 75 V), which is about enough to switch it from "halfway between" to "almost I-phase" . But in retrospect I don't think it has anything to do with the CC loop actuation of the GRPS since this happens even without the CC engaged. I think I really need to clean up my understanding of the green path and electronics.

Phase locked loops

No major issues. Seems completely fixed.

Infrared mode cleaner

As I noticed in my last post, the IRMC error signal had a large DC offset. I don't know where it came from, but it seems to be a recent issue. I used the "offset" knob on the servo to center the error signal at the appropriate level. The IRMC remained locked for > 1 hour using ND1 on the reflection PD with 424 mV error signal. However, the error signal peak size seems to be fluctuating quite a lot, and the IRMC reflected power also is not very stable. Qualitatively I didn't the see the same behaviour as much when looking at the transmitted power with the power meter, though I just lazily held the power meter and didn't mount it (the ring sensor doesn't have a clamping base and there weren't any left in FC cleanroom). I suspect that the sideband power is fluctuating a lot for some reason, a bit more compared to the carrier. However, the SHG error signal, which uses the same sidebands, is quite stable.

Local oscillator alignment

The LO was a bit misaligned to the homodyne so I rebalanced it. It was also slightly misaligned to the alignment mode cleaner but not so much. I recovered the mode matching to quite a good level. Usually this alignment ends up being the best of the squeezer table (it was 99.99% last time I measured it). The LO seems to be unbalancing quite a lot lately. It might be necessary to carefully re-check the alignment to homodyne.

Squeezing to homodyne alignment

I locked OPO for BAB (ppol 250 MHz) and saw that it was very misaligned at the AMC - TEM00, yaw and pitch HOMs were all about the same level. I realigned to ~95% mode match. That said, the BAB is combining with LO by reflecting at the balancing BS which is used to adjust 50/50 balance of LO to the homodyne, so the misalignment is was probably due to adjusting that BS too much.

Optical parametric oscillator and coherent control

I didn't optimize the green alignment to OPO, temperature or ppol frequency, but by scanning the CC1 (green phase shifter) phase I could see the level of amplification/deamplification in the OPO on the CC1 error signal, and it was the same size as last time I checked so I just moved on. ppol and BAB alignment are fine and lock with no problems. CC1 locked with no issues. CC2 missed a bit at first but that was how I came across the aformentioned sqz/LO misalignment. After sqz to AMC was fixed CC2 locked with no issues. With no CC1 scan, the coherent control error signals are nice and flat compared to the mess they were this time last year.

Squeezing

I observed squeezing to about -137 dB (-5 dB) at high frequency > 30 kHz. The noise floor seemed also ok at about 100 Hz but had a lot of 50 Hz harmonics (spectrum of LO only didn't have much). There is a large bump that looks like a mode cleaner resonance in the range of 5-20 kHz. This might be related to the IRMC power fluctuation mentioned above.

The spectrum noise was completely stationary for about 10 minutes, which is great. Eventually the squeezed state was lost by green unlock. I relocked green again so see how long the squeezing could be maintained, but green lost lock maybe 30 seconds after squeezing was reacquired, and the GRMC error signal had gone back to Q-phase. Therefore, understanding the renewed green lock regime and figuring out the IRMC carrier/sideband noises are the most pressing issues to recover the appropriate squeezing level for the Taiwan tomography project.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
MichaelPage - 04:27, Thursday 26 December 2024 (3865)Get code to link to this report
GRMC fixed but IRMC still a problem

Somehow the GRMC/MZ error signal demodulation phase issue was fixed. Actually, part of the problem seemed to be the SHG - for some reason the gain was too low causing the output to have some uncontrolled slow sinusoidal oscillation of output green power as well as poor lock stability. I turned it up to the threshold of oscillation from high gain (separate to the kind of oscillation mentioned in the previous sentence, which is much slower) and then reduced it so that the output stops oscillating - the setting value changes from 0.08 -> 1.6 just by eye. Maybe a little bit change by UGF optimization but I don't know why the optimal gain changed suddenly. Anyway once again the green path seems ok and sends stable 25 mW to OPO.

IRMC still gives me problems. Once again, the system can find the lock threshold but refuses to hold lock very well. Even when it "locks" there are a lot of quite significant bumps and glitches in the reflected power that can be seen on the oscilloscope. I tried switching PZT high voltage drivers with IRPS, GRPS, GRMC but it didn't work. I tried using a variable ND filter at ~ ND0.4 (vs ND1 previously)to bring the base level of the IRMC reflection spectrum to about 9 V, close to the PD saturation. The gain was too high but turning it down, I could see that the IRMC locks... for about 1 minute and then the same problem comes back. I tried a weaker signal with about ND1.5 worth of attenuation but it didn't even find the threshold. The carrier and sideband peaks in the error signal both appear to be fluctuating in power as well - this does not seem to happen for SHG error signal which comes from the same modulator, nor does it happen for IRMC reflection spectrum which uses the same PZT. I might have to try taking the 18 dB RF amplifier in the error signal path. Also when I got home I noticed there was some DC offset on the error signal (fig 1) which I guess I should check out as well.

Images attached to this report
3865_20241225201904_img1174.jpg
BIGFOOT (cell birefringence)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 15:46, Monday 23 December 2024 (3864)Get code to link to this report
new kind of hydrogel measurement

Katsuki, Shalika

We are measuring new kind of hydrogel. bis-phenyl-1O 1.5 mm sheet.

measurement using 0.5-3.5V with 0.25V step.

C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\Cell Birefringence\Measurement data\hydrogel

the force value is saved in the comment column

input:

Mon, Dec 23, 2024 3-43-55 PM.txt

output:

Mon, Dec 23, 2024 2-57-16 PM.txt

check, before water: -13.23 azi, 21.7 ell . It remains same after adding water to hydrogel during measurement.

Comments related to this report
ShalikaSingh - 18:30, Sunday 12 January 2025 (3879)

The analysis of the results give the following results. 

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
MichaelPage - 21:32, Thursday 12 December 2024 (3862)Get code to link to this report
Recurring issues with GRMC, IRMC

Yuheng, Michael

We tried to look at squeezing again to see if our issues went away.

We initially tried replacing the ND filter covering the IRMC reflection photodiode. Currently, we have for screw on ND filters, ND 0.3 (too weak), ND 1.0 (too strong), ND2.0. But no ND 0.5 lying around. I purchased a variable ND filter a while ago so we tried putting it between IRMC reflection and the error signal PD. I could adjust it so that the base level of the reflection spectrum is close to saturation (~ 8V) and the PDH error signal is the usual shape with 1.25 Vpk (3 times what it was before). The attentuation was 1.06/2.81 = 0.377 which is ND 0.42. The threshold was adjusted to the good point and the IRMC was locked. The gain had to be turned down from ~ 10 to about 4 to prevent oscillation. However, the homodyne spectrum did not look so good. At first I guessed this was due to the influence of the variable ND filter, so I removed it and put ND1 back (which is what we were using before). But then it turned out that the homodyne was quite misaligned. I rebalanced the homodyne and the spectrum became ok. Anyway, I should purchase some more screw on ND filters since that variable one is not AR coated for 1064.

I could see the CC error signal that indicates that nonlinear gain is present (roughly, nonlinear gain*sin(green phase mismatch)). It seems stable and not causing problems. So the squeezing output seems fine.

I wanted to demonstrate LO/sqz overlap using AMC, but then the IRMC lock became unstable again. I am not entirely sure what is causing the IRMC lock issue. Staring at it for a while, the PDH error signal sometimes becomes much smaller. It seems to go away after we leave and then turn off the high voltage driver and come back some time later. It could be that the high voltage driver is faulty. Switching for an optimal ND filter might be a temporary fix, but it seems we need a new HVD...

Another issue was that the GRMC kept unlocking. It seems the phase of the PDH error signal is randomly changing in a seemingly not continuous manner. Sometimes it is in perfect I-phase and sometimes it goes to almost Q-phase. I don't know what causes it right now but it could have something to do with the 88.3 MHz lock scheme. 

BIGFOOT (Readout)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 17:06, Monday 09 December 2024 (3861)Get code to link to this report
TF of rf ckt

The TF of ckt with EOM was measured using moku. The resonant freq should be around 394kHz, but I don't see any peak at all (even after zooming in at several frequencies). 

Fig 1 - simulation

Fig 2 - moku measurement

I don't know why the circuit doesnt have a narrow rf peak. The gain magnitude doesn't match simulation and there is no peak. 

Images attached to this report
3861_20241209090502_weom.png 3861_20241209090506_weommokutf.png
BIGFOOT (Readout)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 14:45, Monday 09 December 2024 (3860)Get code to link to this report
TF of Opamp part of RF ckt

The RF part and opamp part are currently disconnected. The response of ckt Fig 1 is shown in Fig 2. 

Although the bandwidth of Op27 is 8MHz, it doesn't behave well, after kHz range. Perhaps I should tweak the feedback resistor value. The cables used to measure are very short (<20cm)

Images attached to this report
3860_20241209064222_opamp.png 3860_20241209064349_opampmokutf.png
BIGFOOT (Characterization)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 14:27, Friday 06 December 2024 (3859)Get code to link to this report
Measuring BB1EO3

C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Birefringence Measurements\Coating measurement\BB1-E03\20241206\Fri, Dec 6, 2024 2-09-14 PM.txt

Images attached to this report
3859_20241206062648_20241206142633.jpg
BIGFOOT (Characterization)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 11:35, Friday 06 December 2024 (3858)Get code to link to this report
BS for coating characterization with new power meter

The 2nd BS was installed to measure coatings

input calibration

infront of 1st BS with only power meter C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Polarization states\Wed, Dec 4, 2024 6-39-05 PM.txt

polarization states after 1st BS C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Polarization states\Thu, Dec 5, 2024 1-10-34 PM.txt

Measurement of the 2nd BS (the BS used to measure coatings)

Front face reflection

C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Birefringence Measurements\Beam Splitter Calibration\20241205\frontrefl\Fri, Dec 6, 2024 10-55-55 AM.txt

Back face tranmission

C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Birefringence Measurements\Beam Splitter Calibration\20241205\Backfacetra\Thu, Dec 5, 2024 3-15-50 PM.txt

measurement take again after some time

C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Birefringence Measurements\Beam Splitter Calibration\20241205\Backfacetra\Thu, Dec 5, 2024 6-35-25 PM.txt

The Back face transmission is the input polarization states

BIGFOOT (Readout)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 16:25, Thursday 05 December 2024 (3856)Get code to link to this report
Comment to RF circuit for EOM (Click here to view original report: 3745)

The maximum voltage that can be provided to this circuit should be 0.085V. If the voltage exceeds this, then the OpAmp will be damaged as the current would be more than 20mA. 

So, the safe range for input voltage is from 0-0.085 V. The voltage to crystal will be 0-644V. The half wave voltage is achieved at 0.05V of input.

BIGFOOT (LC)
Print this report.
ShalikaSingh - 13:54, Thursday 05 December 2024 (3855)Get code to link to this report
Laser Noise from PD

The PD infront of laser(lightwave 126-1064-100) to just check its stability.

Images attached to this report
3855_20241205055444_lasernoise.png
R&D (Speed meter)
Print this report.
YoheiNishino - 18:02, Wednesday 04 December 2024 (3851)Get code to link to this report
Lock Acquisition and evaluation of the PCC GR locking

Nishino,

2024.12.04

See

LockAqu/DataLogger.ipynb

Noise2/DataLogger2.ipynb

Fig.1 shows lock acquisition process. IR and GR are phase-locked. First, the main IR is locked to the main cavity. Second, by changing voltage to the piezo on PCM, one finds the optimal position of the PCM which realizes speed meter. Third, by changing the local oscillator frequency for PLL, one makes the fundamental mode of the GR laser resonate in the PCC. Finally, by turning on the loop, the PCC is locked.

Fig.2 shows the IR transmission, which is the interference of the first and second circulation light. This reflects the fluctuation of the PCC length for the IR. Red and blue are the ASD when turning the PCC locking on and off. 

Images attached to this report
3851_20241204040816_lockacquisition.png 3851_20241204080157_output.png