LOG-IN
Displaying reports 2041-2060 of 3275.Go to page Start 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 End
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
MatteoLeonardi - 00:28, Thursday 11 July 2019 (1460)Get code to link to this report
Comment to 50Hz brought by network analyzer (Click here to view original report: 1457)
Check the power supply of the network analyzer connection. To avoid ground loops it should be connected to the same power line of the rack.
KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
MatteoLeonardi - 23:55, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1459)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Recovery of the absorption bench (Vol. 3) (Click here to view original report: 1455)

With Manuel's help I managed to change the sensitivity initialization of the lock-in. Now it is set at 5mV/mA.
I restarted the measurement around 23:45 after measuring the stability of the pump laser: dP/P < 2.5% (see attached fig.1)

KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
MatteoLeonardi - 23:17, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1458)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Recovery of the absorption bench (Vol. 3) (Click here to view original report: 1455)

I logged in to monitor the measurement and found that the labview crashed. I tried to restart the measurement but the computer was unbearably slow so I reboted it.
The crash of the labview and subsequent restart resetted the LockIn parameters, therefore the measurement now seems unfeasible.

We will investigate tomorrow how to solve this problem.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 23:17, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1457)Get code to link to this report
50Hz brought by network analyzer

Pierre, Aritomi and Yuhang

We found that when we just connect the source port of network analyzer to servo, the error signal presents a very very large 50Hz noise.

Comments related to this report
MatteoLeonardi - 00:28, Thursday 11 July 2019 (1460)
Check the power supply of the network analyzer connection. To avoid ground loops it should be connected to the same power line of the rack.
YuhangZhao - 11:05, Thursday 11 July 2019 (1461)

When I connect it with the same power with rack, the 50Hz noise becomes even higher!

Another thing to be noticed is that when I use SR560 as servo, and inject noise from network analyzer to SR560, there is no 50Hz noise!

KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
MatteoLeonardi - 20:18, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1456)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Recovery of the absorption bench (Vol. 3) (Click here to view original report: 1455)

Today at 20:15 I checked the status of the map and found that the computer rebooted (apparently due to some windows updates even if the auto-update was switched off).
Luckily the laser was still operating at the previously set value, so I restarted the map at 20:17.

KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
SimonZeidler - 18:33, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1455)Get code to link to this report
Recovery of the absorption bench (Vol. 3)

Matteo, Eleonora, Simon

With the alignment set yesterday and the day before (see log entries 1448 and 1445), we were able to start with inserting a sapphire mirror (SHINKOSHA, No. 7). We are using this mirror as a kind of a test-sample to check whether the system is giving reliable data since this sample has been measured already in the past.
 

  • We removed the silica mirror from the mirror-holder (that one is now stored in the small shelf inside the clean-room - be very careful when moving around as it is easy to hit!!!)
  • We took the sapphire mirror from its container and put it inside the mirror-holder (see attached pictures)
  • For placing the mirror-holder inside the transition-stage, we removed the protection-shield around the detector-bench, relocated the imaging units of both red and IR (red -> 6.7mm), and moved the translation-stage to a convenient position
  • Then, we placed the mirror-holder on the translation-stage
  • After that, we put the protection shield

Note: In order to have enough clearance for the mirror (thickness ~15cm), we removed the IR imaging-unit later on

Once the mirror was set, we started a checkup measurement to compare our setup with measurements from the past:

  • Setting the border-limits to define where the mirror starts and ends in Y and X direction
  • Readjusting the imaging-unit to have a maximum in DC
  • Run horizontal measurements to obtain the coordinates of input and output surface with ~1W of input power in the center
  • Run horizontal measurements with 10.47 W of input power to check all initial settings (see screenshot)

With the results, we confirmed an absorption coefficient of ~130 ppm/cm which is in agreement with Manuel's measurements (~119 ppm/cm mean value over an entire map)

Then, in the afternoon, we started to take a X-Y absorption map in the center of the mirror (anticipated duration ~14h). That should be finished by tomorrow.

Images attached to this report
1455_20190710111224_03.jpg 1455_20190710111249_08.jpg 1455_20190710111332_10.jpg 1455_20190710111339_54.jpg 1455_20190710111929_screenshot201907102.png
Comments related to this report
MatteoLeonardi - 20:18, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1456)

Today at 20:15 I checked the status of the map and found that the computer rebooted (apparently due to some windows updates even if the auto-update was switched off).
Luckily the laser was still operating at the previously set value, so I restarted the map at 20:17.

MatteoLeonardi - 23:17, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1458)

I logged in to monitor the measurement and found that the labview crashed. I tried to restart the measurement but the computer was unbearably slow so I reboted it.
The crash of the labview and subsequent restart resetted the LockIn parameters, therefore the measurement now seems unfeasible.

We will investigate tomorrow how to solve this problem.

MatteoLeonardi - 23:55, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1459)

With Manuel's help I managed to change the sensitivity initialization of the lock-in. Now it is set at 5mV/mA.
I restarted the measurement around 23:45 after measuring the stability of the pump laser: dP/P < 2.5% (see attached fig.1)

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 00:34, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1454)Get code to link to this report
Replacement of Green phase shifter base plate(thick post for mirror mount)

Pierre and Yuhang

Since Matteo designed the new base plate for the new mirror mount (RadiantDyes), I replaced the old base plate with this new one. This new one has two holes in the plate, so we expect it to have a better performance.

After the replacement, I tried to lock again with the new MZ/GRMC servo realized by Pierre. But at that moment, we didn't succeed. The reason was found out that somehow GRMC transmission was reduced. Now the highest power we can have for GRMC transmission is around 55mW.

Then we tried to find the coherent control error signal for CC1. But we failed. We will try to figure out the reason tomorrow.

Comments related to this report
YuhangZhao - 14:01, Friday 12 July 2019 (1467)

After I did this replacement, I found there is a new peak appeared. Compared with the alignment Chien-ming did for GRMC, this additional peak has a much higher height.

Today I use a camera to check this peak and it shows shape like the attached figures.

But I think this is not a big issue since we just need to lock on TEM00. But we will lose some power.

YuhangZhao - 22:41, Friday 12 July 2019 (1468)

Aritomi and Yuhang

I found beam was cut obviously at the output port of MZ. The cut position is shown in the attached figure 1.

There is also a very good point to check if the beam is cut or not. In the attached figure 2, the shown place is a round shape. But when the beam was cut, I saw clearly there is an unfilled corner.(I am sorry I didn't realize to take a picture at that time)

In the attached figure 3(cut) and 4(no cut), you can see the difference before and after solving the problem of cutting. The higher order mode becomes a lit bit lower. After that we tried to change the offset of MZ servo, then we found we could reach GRMC transmitted power of 70mW. This meets the requirement of high BAB amplification for filter cavity alignment.

MZ servo offset green power(GRMC tra)
4.7 50mW
5.1 70mW
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 00:21, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1453)Get code to link to this report
Some 50Hz noisy becomes quite obvious now

Eleonora, Pierre, Aritomi, Yuhang

Recently we found 50 Hz presents everywhere. In the attached figures, we can see some examples of these 50Hz noises.

A part of noise level was identified that it comes from of ground loop between circuit and measurement device. This is identified by changing the power supply of the oscilloscope to different places. But we cannot eliminate this noise totally. (From figure 5 to figure 2, the change is the change of oscilloscope power supply)

We also identified that the 50Hz noise for GRMC transmission signal comes from the DDS board. At that moment, only DDS board output is connected to mixer and mixer IF channel is connected to the oscilloscope. We tried to change the connection with and without a lot of other components, and we found only DDS board gives this 50Hz noise.  (Figure 3)

We see a different shape with normal measurement 50Hz noise for GRMC transmission signal, so we think this noise coupled into control loop and affects the phase locking of GRMC a lot. (Figure 2)

Images attached to this report
1453_20190709171607_wechatimg454.jpeg 1453_20190709171617_wechatimg455.jpeg 1453_20190709171626_wechatimg456.jpeg 1453_20190709171634_wechatimg457.jpeg 1453_20190709171642_wechatimg458.jpeg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 00:00, Wednesday 10 July 2019 (1452)Get code to link to this report
The implementation of MZ/GRMC auto-locking

Pierre, Yuhang

After the design/talk/discuss with Matteo, Eleonora and us, Pierre redesign the circuit and we implemented it. Now the procedure is just to press 'reset' button and then MZ and GRMC will be locked in sequence. Please also remember to use 'auto' mode of GRMC and 'man' mode of MZ and put them both in 'lock' state.

Then we measured the open loop transfer function of MZ.

Images attached to this report
1452_20190710160305_grmc.png 1452_20190710160310_mz.png
KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
MatteoLeonardi - 22:12, Tuesday 09 July 2019 (1448)Get code to link to this report
Recovery of the absorption bench (Vol 2)

[Matteo, Simon]

Today we switched on the 1064nm pump laser for the first time after four months. We had some problem identifying the correct COM port (COM11) but solved that the laser could be successfully switched on and controlled from the PCI computer. One thing to be noticed is that the power cord of the pump laser seems to have connection instabilities, please remember to be careful and never touch the plug in into the power supply.

After the successful result on the pump laser we switched on the probe laser (633nm). No problems on that. We had to install a variable OD filter in front of the probe laser not to saturate the photodiode on the imaging unit. We aligned the probe on the imaging unit without any reference sample to have about 4V of DC output as read by the lock in. We then installed the surface reference sample and performed some z scan. NOTE: the written part present on the sample is facing the imaging unit. At this stage we aligned again the probe beam into the imaging unit photodiode maximizing the DC to compensate for the misalignment introduced by the reference sample, we then aligned the pump beam to maximize the AC signal at the crossing point.

MEMO: to align the probe on the IU photodiode we used the IU lens translation stage; to align the IR beam we used the translation stage on the last lens before the sample area.

Attached (1) the screenshot of the absorption measurement for surface reference sample (try one).

After speaking with Manuel, he told us that the written part of the surface reference sample should be facing the pump side and not the IU side. We flipped the surface reference sample and optimized again the alignment and performed again the z scan. Result is in attached figure (2).

In the end we substituted the surface reference sample with the bulk reference sample and measured the z scan. Result is in the attached figure (3).

From measurements shown in (2) and (3) we can obtain the calibration of the system.

R_surf = AC_surfref/(DC_surfref*P_in*abs_surfref) = 16 [1/W]
where AC_surfref = 0.42V, DC_surfref = 3.85V, P_in = 0.031W and abs_surfref = 0.22

R_bulk = AC_bulkref/(DC_bulkref*sqrt(T_bulkref)*P_in*abs_bulkref) = 0.604 [cm/W]
where AC_bulkref = 0.067V, DC_bulkref = 4.64V, T_bulkref = 0.55, P_in = 0.031W and abs_bulkref = 1.04/cm

The two calibration values are compatible with old calibrations.

Images attached to this report
1448_20190709092550_201907091.png 1448_20190709145617_201907092.png 1448_20190709145631_201907093.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 20:31, Tuesday 09 July 2019 (1451)Get code to link to this report
RF amplifier is fixed

[Pierre, Aritomi]

Pierre fixed RF amplifier and measured amplification factor for AOM which is 34dB. Since we should have 23dBm for AOM, RF signal before RF amplifier should be -11dBm.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 20:29, Tuesday 09 July 2019 (1450)Get code to link to this report
Replacement of IR phase shifter

I replaced IR phase shifter with a new one (Pic 1) and aligned IRMC and locked it with Pierre's servo. Tomorrow we'll measure transfer function of CC2.

Images attached to this report
1450_20190709132932_img7666.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 22:25, Monday 08 July 2019 (1447)Get code to link to this report
Back reflection of IR from filter cavity

[Aritomi, Yuhang, Eleonora, Matteo]

Recently we had a problem that when BAB is injected into filter cavity, we cannot lock green phase with p pol leakage of BAB transmission. Today we found that back reflection of IR from filter cavity makes green phase error signal unstable. When we block IR injected into filter cavity, green phase error signal is stable, but when we open it and IR is aligned to filter cavity, green phase error signal fluctuates a lot. We guess that back reflection of IR from filter cavity goes back to OPO and amplified and becomes p pol leakage.

To reduce back reflection, we put faraday (IO-3-1064-VHP) after OPO on the bench (Pic 1,2). BAB transmission without green before faraday is 103mV and 100mV after faraday, which means transmissivity is 97%. 

After installation of faraday, IR is totally misaligned. We'll try to align faraday tomorrow.

Images attached to this report
1447_20190708152506_12.png 1447_20190708152513_img7660.jpeg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 19:44, Monday 08 July 2019 (1446)Get code to link to this report
How to connect remote desktop from cleanroom

To connect the DGS remote desktop from cleanroom, please use Remote Desktop Connection, not Microsoft Remote Desktop. I put Remote Desktop Connection to taskbar in computer in clean room.

KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
SimonZeidler - 19:44, Monday 08 July 2019 (1445)Get code to link to this report
Recovery of the absorption bench 1

Matteo, Simon

We tried to start recovering the absorption bench today by reactivating the translation-stage. For this step it is necessary to reset the position of the stage, but unfortunately we got problems with this especially for the vertical axis of the stage.
After some time of an unsuccessful try and error approach, we called Manuel and tried to redo the steps he was doing usually.

In the end, we could reactivate the whole stage by tricking the Zaber console (the PC program controlling the stage) which turned out to be the main burden for a proper reset since the predefined limits for the vertical axis made it impossible reach the "home" position manually.

Actually, I added a more particular description of what we have done in the GWPO wiki: here and here

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 15:00, Monday 08 July 2019 (1444)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Dip of reflected beam (Click here to view original report: 1440)

By rough estimation, the reflected power dropped ~0.3mW, though I could not see any transmitted flash.

The reflected beam power was ~3mW with 3.5V.
The dip was ~0.4V.
3mW * 0.4V / 3.5V ~ 0.3mW

The loss and high reflectivity may cause too small transmitted power.

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 14:07, Monday 08 July 2019 (1443)Get code to link to this report
Input optical layout

I updated the input optical layout as attached figure.
HOMs pahts are under construction now.

Images attached to this report
1443_20190708070715_layoutinputv3.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 19:18, Sunday 07 July 2019 (1442)Get code to link to this report
Further improvement of IR alignment

[Aritomi, Eleonora P&C, Yuhang]

This is work on July 5th.

We scanned green phase at 1kHz and scanned AOM again. The result of AOM scan and TEM00 are attached. With 1kHz green phase scan, TEM00 peak isn't measured properly. After AOM scan, we locked IR on TEM00 and HG01,10 and measured each power with dataviewer.

AOM frequency (MHz) IR transmission mode
109.03643 500 - 1200 TEM00
109.43154 100 - 200 HG10
109.43199 150 - 400 HG01

Then we tried to improve the alignment of IR. TEM00 and HG10,01 with 10 Hz green phase scan after the alignment is as follows.

AOM frequeny (MHz) IR transmission mode
109.03646 100 - 5500 TEM00
109.43156 100 - 300 HG10
109.43204 100 - 400 HG01

We haven't measured all the higer order modes, but mode matching should be around 90% now.

Images attached to this report
1442_20190707121914_20190705scan.png 1442_20190707122105_20190705tem00.png
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 15:47, Sunday 07 July 2019 (1441)Get code to link to this report
Transmittance of silicon mirror

I measured the transmittance of one of the silicon mirrors using power meter.
When I injected 10mW power laser, the transmitted power was about 0.2uW.
This corresponds to T=20ppm.
If the loss is zero, this transmittance corresponds to finesse~150,000.

So it seemes that the coating is not what we wanted.

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 19:36, Friday 05 July 2019 (1440)Get code to link to this report
Dip of reflected beam

Yesterday, I measured the beam profile, and the beam had its waist around 1250mm distance from FI with ~60um beam radius.
Then I adjusted the beam height to achieve ''straight'' beam.

Next, I scaned the laser freq. using both temp. control and PZT of the laser.
During scanning the freq., I monitored both transmitted beam, and reflected beam.

I could see some dips in reflection, though I could not see any transmitted beam.
I have not checked the error signal yet, it may be possible to lock the laser, but it seemes difficult to see transmitted beam.

Images attached to this report
1440_20190705121349_dipt.jpg 1440_20190705121353_dipp.jpg
Comments related to this report
SatoshiTanioka - 15:00, Monday 08 July 2019 (1444)

By rough estimation, the reflected power dropped ~0.3mW, though I could not see any transmitted flash.

The reflected beam power was ~3mW with 3.5V.
The dip was ~0.4V.
3mW * 0.4V / 3.5V ~ 0.3mW

The loss and high reflectivity may cause too small transmitted power.