LOG-IN
Displaying reports 1901-1920 of 3413.Go to page Start 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 End
KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
PengboLi - 16:55, Thursday 31 October 2019 (1789)Get code to link to this report
Reflectance and Transmittance of the OSTM sample with ATC coatings
[Simon, Pengbo]

Today we reconfigured the setup to birefringence measurement. First, we measured the reflectance and transmittance under different conditions.

With the P-pol input polarization, we got
P_in = 7.64 mW, P_refl = 7.559 mW, P_trans = 0.206 mW
R = 0.9894, T = 0.0270
With the S-pol input polarization, we got
P_in = 7.649 mW, P_refl = 7.602 mW, P_trans = 0.007 mW
R = 0.9939, T = 0.0009

Then, we did the S-polarization map on TAMA#1. The result will be shown tomorrow.

KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
PengboLi - 09:40, Thursday 31 October 2019 (1788)Get code to link to this report
Absorption map of OSTM with ATC coating
[Simon, Pengbo]

We reconfigured the PCI system and measured the absorption map of the OSTM sample with ATC coating.

As can be seen, the figure shows a large value of absorption. And there are many spots with absorption excesses. Most likely, they are due to defects of the coating
Images attached to this report
1788_20191031051107_figureabs1.png 1788_20191031051114_figureabs2.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YaoChinHuang - 22:23, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1786)Get code to link to this report
Measure demodulator performance

[Yao-Chin, Yuhang]

Frequency from DDS with -6.5dBm sent to input LO & RF ports of demodulator (ZFMIQ-70D). The demodulator output I & Q ports connected low pass filter of DC-2.5MHz. We measured the Vpp and phase difference of I & Q ports from oscilloscope. 

Note: Unbalance Amplitude (dB)= 20* log (Vpp of I port/ Vpp of Q port)

(I) Fixed LO port frequency of 78 MHz

LO 
(MHz)
RF
(MHz)
Vpp of I
(mV)
Vpp of Q
(mV)
Unbalance Amplitude
(dB)
Phase Difference btw I&Q
(degree)
78
78.0001
286
254
1.03
90.4
78
78.001
284
254
0.97
90.8
78
78.01
282
250
1.05
90.2
78
78.05
255
222
1.20
90.5
78
78.1
210
182
1.82
91.7

 
(II) Fixed difference frequency of 100 Hz between LO and RF ports tune range from 66 to 80 MHz.

LO
(MHz)
RF
(MHz)
Vpp of I
(mV)
Vpp of Q
(mV)
Unbalance Amplitude
(dB)
Phase Difference btw I&Q
(degree)
66.0001
66
260
260
0
91.2
67.0001
67
262
260
0.07
90.1
68.0001
68
266
260
0.20
90.9
69.0001
69
266
260
0.20
90.6
70.0001
70
270
260
0.33
90.7
71.0001
71
272
260
0.39
90.9
72.0001
72
274
260
0.46
90.9
73.0001
73
276
259
0.55
90.6
74.0001
74
278
258
0.65
89.8
75.0001
75
281
258
0.74
90.2
76.0001
76
282
258
0.77
90.2
77.0001
77
282
255
0.87
90.6
78.0001
78
286
254
1.03
90.4
79.0001
79
286
254
1.03
90.1
80.0001
80
286
251
1.13
90.9

* Phase: Q=I+90o for LO>RF, Q=I-90o for LO<RF

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 21:39, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1785)Get code to link to this report
Test of QPD by using 532nm light

To have an idea about how PD responses (at RF frequency) to green light. We did this test.

The test set-up is as shown in the attached figure 1 and 2. We put a periscope after the first green FI. It brings the green beam up to the second layer of the bench. At the second layer, we put a lens and a steering mirror to make sure the light is small enough and hit in the first quarter of QPD2. We connected the corresponding DC channel to the oscilloscope to check the output voltage DC. We also connect the corresponding RF channel to a 32dB amplifier and then a spectrum analyzer(Keysight N9320B) to check its noise spectrum.

To avoid any modulation and even RF cross-talk, we turned off the DDS system. The green power is changed by moving the offset of high voltage driver(connect to the PZT of SHG). We checked this offset is stable enough so that the green power doesn't change larger than 4% within the time of one measurement.

Within one measurement, we measured the light power/output voltage DC/output current(measured by using the 'putty')/RF channel spectrum.

Output voltage DC(V) Light power(mW) Output current(mA)

Calculated current(mA)

(photosensitivity is 0.2A/W according to specification)

power loss (%)

(inferred from measured and calculated current)

5.6 34.5 5.3 6.9 23.2
7.7 53.5 7.4 10.7 30.8
8.8 70 8.7 14 37.9
10 90 10 18 44

The relation between power and voltage/current is attached in figure 4.

I also calculated the shot noise by using this formula: shot noise = 10*log((sqrt(2*1.6e-19*I)*sqrt(RBW))**2*35/1mW)+32+22, then I got the calculated shot noise level

Output Voltage DC(V) Calculated shot noise(dBm)
5.6 -48.3
7.7 -46.8
8.8 -46.1
10 -45.5

While the measured shot noise is attached in figure 3, which shows -60dBm for all different light power.

Images attached to this report
1785_20191030131525_setup1.jpeg 1785_20191030131530_setup2.jpeg 1785_20191030131715_good2.png 1785_20191030133809_figure3.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 19:44, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1783)Get code to link to this report
Input picomotor stuck
Today when we tried to realign the cavity we found that we have to steer a lot the input mirror in yaw.  Maybe it moved a bit during the opening/closing of the chamber.
 
We tried to move the mirror with picomotors but they got stuck and now the intermediate mass is touching the frame, as it can be seen from the spectrum attached.
 
Probabily we need to open the chamber to fix it.
Images attached to this report
1783_20191030114419_input.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 19:37, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1782)Get code to link to this report
Top coil of input mirror fixed

On Tue 29/11 we open INPUT vacuum chamber. Takahashi-san found the wire to the ground pin of the circuit of the top coil was broken. See picture.

He repaired it. We closed the chamber and check the the coil is working fine now.

Images attached to this report
1782_20191030113743_in4.jpeg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 17:16, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1780)Get code to link to this report
Lens position before homodyne

[Yuhang, Aritomi]

We had homodyne noise spectrum bump problem reported in entry1529.

One of the reasons could be the cut issue of PD, and I checked the entry1159. I found that the 'beam analyzer' was put in a wrong position. The corrected version is attached here. In this version, the 'beam analyzer' is marking the position where the beam size(100um) is 5times smaller than the size of PD(500um). So we can decide that the homodyne PD should be 26mm~32mm after 30mm lens. This means we have only 6mm range to make sure the beam is smaller enough than the size of PD(500um).

We also measured again the shot noise after this work(attached picture 2 and 3). The bump issue sometimes is till present, but it covers region smaller than 20Hz and rarely show up. But we found small 45Hz and 54Hz peaks which are not present in previous measurement. They may due to we didn't cover bench as before(now the west side is half open and south side is open).

Images attached to this report
1780_20191030090244_20191030homosize.png 1780_20191030090611_celingon.jpg 1780_20191030090614_off.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
MatteoLeonardi - 17:03, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1781)Get code to link to this report
Second failure of the BS TMP
[Eleonora, Takahashi, Matteo]

Today we had another failure of the BS TMP.
The error is number 089 which is for "Rotor vibration". The pump stopped autonomously.

After consulting with Takahashi-san we closed the gate valve between the TMP and the BS chamber as well as the valve between the BS TMP and RP and switched off the BS RP.
At this stage the pressure in the BS+PR was around 10^-3 mbar. In the input tower it was 10^-7 and in the arm 10^-8 (the gate valve around the input tower were still closed due to the work performed yesterday on the input mirror coil).
We open the gate valve between input and PB+PR and the pressure stabilized around 10^-4. So we let it go down few minutes until the pressure in input+BS+PR reached 10^-6 and then we opened the gate valve between the arm and the CITF. After that the pressure stabilized around 10^-6 and it is slowly going down.

In this moment there is only the pumping system of the input tower working for the central area.
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 14:08, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1779)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Work on Cryostat (Click here to view original report: 1768)

This entry is log on 28th Oct.
I cut some teflon sheet for cushioning between glass window and adapter.

Images attached to this comment
1779_20191030060427_20191029teflon.jpg
KAGRA MIR (Polarization)
Print this report.
PengboLi - 11:21, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1778)Get code to link to this report
Polarization Maps on OSTM with ATC coatings
[Simon, pengbo]

We measured the polarization map of OSTM with different polarization angles.
0 degrees represent pure p-polarization. 90 degrees represent pure s-polarization. 40.5 degrees represent a mixture of sp polarization with a ratio of 1 to 1.

Images attached to this report
1778_20191030032021_figurep1.png 1778_20191030032026_figures1.png 1778_20191101064337_figuresp1.png 1778_20191101064407_figurep2.png 1778_20191101064412_figures2.png 1778_20191101064417_figuresp2.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 10:38, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1777)Get code to link to this report
FDS measurement: fit for different HOM angles

[Matteo, Eleonora]

We used the code that simulates the homodyne spectrum for FDS at differente angles (entry #1774) and tried to optimize the angle to fit the data of our last FDS measurement (entry #1751)

The results in the attached figure show a quite good agreement between data (solid line) and simulation (dotted line)  

The degradation parameters used in the code are the following:

sqz_dB = 16;                         % produced SQZ

L_rt = 100e-6;                       % FC losses

L_inj = 0.33;                        % Injection losses

L_ro = 0.11;                         % Readout losses

A0 = 0.1;                            % Squeezed field/filter cavity mode mismatch losses

C0 = 0.05;                           % Squeezed field/local oscillator mode mismatch losses

ERR_L =   5e-12;                     % Lock accuracy [m]

ERR_csi = 80e-3;                     % Phase noise[rad]

det =  50.62e3;                      % detuning frequency 

int = 2e3;                           % frequency range = det+/-int   

t_in_q   = 0.0014;                   % input mirror transmission 

gamma_fc = ((t_in_q + L_rt)/2)*fsr;  % = 59.6*2*pi

Images attached to this report
1777_20191030023841_fdsplotsim.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 22:22, Monday 28 October 2019 (1776)Get code to link to this report
Effect of second harmonic of 7MHz (CCFC)

To check how much second harmonic of 7MHz CC/LO beat note affects 14MHz CCSB beat note, I put TAMA RFPD before AMC and detected LO and CC at the same time. CC is directly injected from OPO and CC1 is locked. I compared 14MHz peak height with only CC or CC+LO. Pic. 1,2 shows 14MHz signal with only CC or CC+LO. Apparently 14MHz peak height is almost same.

Then I demodulated the 14MHz signal with 14MHz and measured spectrum of the demodulated signal (Pic. 3). Spectrum with CC+LO has some excess noise compared with only CC and the noise shape seems similar to CC2 phase noise. This noise should come from second harmonic of 7MHz.

Images attached to this report
1776_20191028142229_cconly.jpg 1776_20191028142235_cclo.jpg 1776_20191029071616_cclo20191028.png
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 18:12, Monday 28 October 2019 (1775)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Work on Cryostat (Click here to view original report: 1768)

Today I temporary installed the adapter flange and 4K shiled inside the cryostat chamber to confirm the screw hole position is correct.
The adapter flange and shield seemed to be O.K., but I need 10 more ultrasonic cleaned M6 screws.

In addition to that, we need super insulator on 4K shield and tape to fix cables.

The procudure for remaining tasks are:

  1. Prepare windows for 80K shield
  2. Install windows on 80K shield
  3. Cabling on 4K shield
  4. Attach SI on 4K shield
  5. Install 4K shield
Images attached to this comment
1775_20191028101038_20191028adapter.jpg 1775_20191028101042_20191028shield.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 15:35, Monday 28 October 2019 (1774)Get code to link to this report
Simulation of the HOM output for different detection angles

I adapted the code to simulate the squeezing degradation in the case of standalone filter cavity.  Basically, I removed the transfer matrix accountig for ITF  in the quantum noise computation.

Now if we select a homodyne detection angle the code should simulated what we exepected to see when taking the spectrum of the Homodyne output.

In the code I also removed the approximation of small detuning and I simulate a large detunig case (50kHz) as the one we tested recently. (Entries:  #1747#1751)

Plot 1 shows the expected results for Homodyne angle: 0 deg and 90 deg. Plot 2 shows an intermediate case (30 deg) compared to the  0 deg case.

The degradation parameters are the same reported in entry  #1766

Images attached to this report
1774_20191028073149_hom090.png 1774_20191028073326_hom030.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
RyutaroTakahashi - 15:03, Monday 28 October 2019 (1773)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Baking of BS TMP (Click here to view original report: 1772)

I stopped the baking at 14:30. It was applied for 4 hours in this time.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
RyutaroTakahashi - 11:14, Monday 28 October 2019 (1772)Get code to link to this report
Baking of BS TMP

I set the thermostat to control the temparature of heater. The set temparature is 110 oC. I started the baking of BS TMP from 10:30AM.

Images attached to this report
1772_20191028031420_bakingofbstmp.jpg
Comments related to this report
RyutaroTakahashi - 15:03, Monday 28 October 2019 (1773)

I stopped the baking at 14:30. It was applied for 4 hours in this time.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 13:21, Sunday 27 October 2019 (1771)Get code to link to this report
Comment to IR locking accuracy (Click here to view original report: 1769)

Most of the RMS is accumualted below 10 Hz. We observed a correlation between the PDH error signal for IR (demodualtion of 15 Mhz sidebands) and the lock correction signal from RAMPEAUTO.

At the time of the measument we know the IR alignment was not good. This can be the cause of such behaviour.  We should repeat this measurement in good alignment condition.

KAGRA MIR (Polarization)
Print this report.
PengboLi - 10:44, Friday 25 October 2019 (1770)Get code to link to this report
Polarization Maps of OSTM (SK)
[Simon, Pengbo]

Attached to this report are the polarization maps on OSTM from Sigma Koki.

The maps are taken with different polarization angles indicated in each figure, with 0 degrees being pure P-polarization.
Images attached to this report
1770_20191025032511_figurep1.png 1770_20191025032515_figures1.png 1770_20191101064516_figuresp1.png 1770_20191101064521_figurep2.png 1770_20191101064525_figures2.png 1770_20191101064530_figuresp2.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 23:04, Thursday 24 October 2019 (1769)Get code to link to this report
IR locking accuracy

[Aritomi, Yuhang, Yaochin, Eleonora]

We measured IR error signal of filter cavity using BAB with TAMA PD which is same as CC1 PD in the reflection path from filter cavity. Pic. 1 shows IR error signal and IR transmission when filter cavity is scanned with AOM (setting is Pic. 2). Calculation method of calibration factor is same as entry 750.

Calibration:
peak-peak voltage of error signal: 26.2 mV
peak-peak time difference of error signal: 98 ms
slope = peak-peak voltage of error signal/peak-peak time difference of error signal = 26.2 mV/98 ms = 0.267 V/s
AOM scan frequency: 500 mHz
AOM deviation: 1 kHz
AOM scan speed for green: AOM deviation/AOM scan frequency = 2 kHz/s
AOM scan speed for IR: 2kHz/s /2 = 1 kHz/s
 
Calibration factor:
AOM scan speed for IR (Hz/s)/(2*slope(V/s)) = 1000(Hz/s)/(2*0.267(V/s)) = 1873 Hz/V

Note that factor of 2 in calibration factor is because slope of error signal on resonance is as twice as slope of peak-peak of error signal.

Then we measured spectrum of IR error signal when IR is locked on resonance and calculated rms (Pic.3). IR locking accuracy is 4.2 Hz which corresponds to 4.5 pm of locking accuracy. Pic. 4 shows squeezing degradation with this locking accuracy. In addition to mode mismatch, locking accuracy is also dominating. We need IR locking.

Images attached to this report
1769_20191024160409_error.jpg 1769_20191024160414_aom.jpg 1769_20210724223331_lockingaccuracy20191024.png 1769_20210724223338_degradation20191024.png
Comments related to this report
EleonoraCapocasa - 13:21, Sunday 27 October 2019 (1771)

Most of the RMS is accumualted below 10 Hz. We observed a correlation between the PDH error signal for IR (demodualtion of 15 Mhz sidebands) and the lock correction signal from RAMPEAUTO.

At the time of the measument we know the IR alignment was not good. This can be the cause of such behaviour.  We should repeat this measurement in good alignment condition.

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 18:46, Thursday 24 October 2019 (1768)Get code to link to this report
Work on Cryostat

[Namai-san, Ueda-san from KEK, Sato-san, and Tomaru-san]

We worked on the cryostat in ATC to install adapters for windows on 80K shield.
What we did is as follows:

  1. Attached the adapters on 80K shield
  2. Adjusted the insulator on 80K shield not to touch the 300K shield
  3. Removed 300K shield for temporary and install 80K shield
  4. Re-installed 300K shield
  5. Re-located the chamber to install the cold head and bellows
  6. Installed an optical breadboard and connected to cold head with grease

Since we don't have indium sheet, we used grease to contact with cold head.
Though this grease can be used in vacuum (~10^-7 Pa), if the contamination on mirrors become a problem, we will remove the grease and use indium sheet.

The remaining tasks are:

  • Install modified 4K shield, and windows on 80K shield
  • Cabling
  • Vacuum check
Images attached to this report
1768_20191024114542_20191024adapter.jpg 1768_20191024114547_20191024bar.jpg
Comments related to this report
SatoshiTanioka - 18:12, Monday 28 October 2019 (1775)

Today I temporary installed the adapter flange and 4K shiled inside the cryostat chamber to confirm the screw hole position is correct.
The adapter flange and shield seemed to be O.K., but I need 10 more ultrasonic cleaned M6 screws.

In addition to that, we need super insulator on 4K shield and tape to fix cables.

The procudure for remaining tasks are:

  1. Prepare windows for 80K shield
  2. Install windows on 80K shield
  3. Cabling on 4K shield
  4. Attach SI on 4K shield
  5. Install 4K shield
Images attached to this comment
1775_20191028101038_20191028adapter.jpg 1775_20191028101042_20191028shield.jpg
SatoshiTanioka - 14:08, Wednesday 30 October 2019 (1779)

This entry is log on 28th Oct.
I cut some teflon sheet for cushioning between glass window and adapter.

Images attached to this comment
1779_20191030060427_20191029teflon.jpg