LOG-IN
Displaying reports 1481-1500 of 3275.Go to page Start 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 End
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 18:33, Wednesday 08 July 2020 (2106)Get code to link to this report
QPD1 demodulator modification

Matteo, Yuhang, Eleonora

An attenuator of 12 dB was added in QPD1 demodulator between the LO amplifier and the splitter.

See attached scheme and pictures.

Now a LO of -6dBm (DDS output) shoud not exceed the maximum power allowed by the mixer.

Images attached to this report
2106_20200708113016_demodqpd1.png 2106_20200708113242_dem11.jpeg 2106_20200708113249_dem21.jpeg
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 22:02, Wednesday 01 July 2020 (2105)Get code to link to this report
Lock acquisition and ringdown measurement

What I Did

  • Lock the laser to the folded cavity
  • Did ringdown measurement for rough estimation of the finesse

First, I tried to lock the laser with the servo by adjusting the offset.
Then I could lock and transmitted power was 60 uW.

After that, I turne off the AOM in order to test the ringdown measurement.
The decay time was about 2.5 usec.
It should be noted that the decay time of diffracted beam power by AOM was about 100 nsec.
Therefore, the impact of AOM can be negligible.

From this result, the finesse can be estimated about 1.4-1.5*104.
Next time, I will record the result and calculate the decay time by fitting.

Next Step

  • Measure the OLTF
  • Ringdown measurement test
  • Thermometer installation
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 14:39, Wednesday 01 July 2020 (2104)Get code to link to this report
QPD noise with DGS dominated by ADC noise

Yuhang, Eleonora

On 24/06 we quicky checked the output of demodulated signal QPD2 acquiring it with DGS.

The measurement was done by putting a reflective mirror after the last green faraday before viewport. The beam was centered into the quadrant. Power on QPD was 3.3 mW.

There was no additional amplification.

As shown in Pic. 1 the signal is dominated by ADC noise.

Pic.2 shows a calibrated spectrum of the ADC noise for the 4 channels used to acquire the demodulated RF signals.

Images attached to this report
2104_20200701073637_wfsadc.png 2104_20200701073743_adccalnoise.png
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 19:24, Monday 29 June 2020 (2103)Get code to link to this report
Replacement of screws

I replaced the screws which were used to fix the input and output mirrors.
Then I tried to improve the alignment.
Finally, the transmitted power became about 180 uW.

Tomorrow I will try to measure the finesse and lock the laser.
Then try to measure the OLTF.

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 16:45, Wednesday 24 June 2020 (2102)Get code to link to this report
Locked with fixed folded cavity

What I Did

Today I locked the laser to the fixed folded cavity.
After the alignment work, I measured the output power by the power meter.
The output power was 4.7 uW.
This may be due to the alignment problem.

Using this value, one can estimate the intra-cavity power.
Since the transmittance of the mirror is 0.017 %, the intra-cavity power can be estimated about 28 mW.
There is room for improvement.

Next Step

I am planing to improve the alignment of the mirrors and try to increase the output power to 100 uW.
Then I will try to lock with pumps on.
Also, some pedestals are to be replaced to vacuum copatible ones.

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 20:49, Tuesday 23 June 2020 (2100)Get code to link to this report
Alignment with fixed folded cavity

Log on June 23, 2020

What I did

First, I tried to lock the laser with turbo pump on.
Actually, the lock was not stable and it may need suspension to reduce the vibration.

Then, I inserted the spacer and installed mirrors to compose the folded cavity.
The procedure was as usual.
This time I removed the block between the spacer and mirror holder to reduce the cavity length as shown in the picture.
Thanks to this, I could see the transmitted flash as shown in the picture (red line).
Still transmitted power is low and need to be improved.

Next step

I will improve the alignment to increase the transmitted power.
Then I will try to lock the laser to the cavity.

Images attached to this report
2100_20200623134914_20200623cav.jpg 2100_20200623134920_20200623trans.jpg
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 19:07, Friday 19 June 2020 (2099)Get code to link to this report
Locked with the servo

Log on June 19, 2020

What I did

I installed the servo which was from TAMA and modified.
Then I tried to lock by adjusting the gain and the offset.

Result

I could lock the laser to the cavity though the lock lasted only 10 sec or so.
The transmitted beam power was about 160 uW.
As the transmittance of the mirror is 0.017%, the intra-cavity power is estimated as about 1 W which is a reasonable value.

Next step

I am planning to lock the laser under the vacuum pressure to check whether I can or not lock when the turbo pump is on.
Also I will measure the open loop TF to see the phase margin and so on.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
RyutaroTakahashi - 17:14, Wednesday 17 June 2020 (2098)Get code to link to this report
Replacement of TMP in NM2

Takahashi, Yuhang, Eleonora

We replaced the TMP near NM2 from TMC1000MC (broken) to STP-1003 (new).

  1. Removed the screws for the ICF253 flange. Dismounted the old TMP.
  2. Mounted the new TMP. Set the rotational direction of exhaust to 225deg. Fastened the screws for the ICF253 flange. Final torque was 250kgf/cm.
  3. Connected the dry pump (DSP250). Started the dry pump. Opened the angle valve.
  4. Turned on the controller. It showed a fail due to different combination between the TMP and the controller. Reset the controller, then the controller went to auto tuning.
  5. Started the TMP. The TMP went to normal operation.
  6. After monitoring for two hours, opened gate valves to the 300-m pipe. The pressure became 4x10-7mbar.
Images attached to this report
2098_20200617101343_newtmpnm21.jpg 2098_20200617101351_newtmpnm22.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 14:42, Wednesday 17 June 2020 (2097)Get code to link to this report
PR oplev PSD replacement

Yuhang, Eleonora

During the "ADC trouble" we found out that PR oplev PSD was not working fine: 

- SUM channel was giving a negative output

- Y channel doesn't respond to vertical movement of the beam position on the sensor

We replaced the PSD with a spare one.

[Note that this spare was previously used for BS oplev (see elog #1947) and we changed it as we suspestected it was noisy but after the replacement we kept oberving occasional noise floor excess in BS so we confirmed that it was not PSD fault.]

After the replacement I mesaured the TF of PR (pic1) and found that it perfeclty overlaps to the previouse one, so I didn't need to modify the gain of the damping loops.

We suspect that PSD falilure can be connected to the AA burnt card. Investingations are on-going.

Images attached to this report
2097_20200617073913_prtfyaw.jpeg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 23:05, Monday 15 June 2020 (2096)Get code to link to this report
Burnt opamps found in the broken AA card

Yuhang, Eleonora

We removed the broken card from the AI module (see elog #2093) and we found that at least 3 opamp AD8622 were burnt. (see pic 1,2)

The evidently broken opamps are: (see pic 3)

CH2 -> Oplev PR X

CH3 -> Oplev PR SUM

CH6 -> Oplev BS SUM

CH3 and CH6 are the most damaged. They corresponds to the SUM of oplev PSD for PR and BS. We remark that this two PSD uses the same power supply. 

We also remark that PR PSD is not working fine anymore (in particular channel Y and SUM).

We asked Miyakawa-san who said they have never had a similar problem in KAGRA. 

Images attached to this report
2096_20200615160445_16.jpeg 2096_20200615160457_26.jpeg 2096_20200616092716_aicard.jpeg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 19:13, Friday 12 June 2020 (2094)Get code to link to this report
ADC works again

Yuhang, Eleonora

I changed the cable connection in order to move the channels that were connected to the broken AA card (AA 0 1-4 and 5-8) to a spare one in another AA module ( AA1 17-20 and 21-24). See Pic1.

I modified real time model accordingly. See pic2.

We tested the ADC input 1-8 and they are working fine now.  

Power supply is also ok since we disconnected the broken card inside the module, two days ago. Pic 3.

While doing ADC test we realize PSD of PR Oplev has some trouble. We will investiange it later.

Images attached to this report
2094_20200612121250_dgschan.jpeg 2094_20200612121302_rtm.jpeg 2094_20200612121605_powersupply.jpeg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 18:59, Thursday 11 June 2020 (2093)Get code to link to this report
the first card in AA 0 module is broken

Yuhang, Eleonora

On Tue evening 9/06 we found out that some of the ADC channel were not working fine and one of the two power supplies was delivering the maximum current (3 A) and the saturation led was on.

I switched it off and on but after ~30 min it stated to saturated again. A strong smell of overheated plastic was present around the ADC/DAC modules. I switched it off for the night.

Yesterday after confirming that DACs were working fine we check the ADC channels one by one. Here what we found:

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
no sign  no sign  no sign  strange

strange

strange OK OK  OK  OK

strange

OK OK OK OK OK

 

We suspected the first card of the AI module (channel 1-8). We extracted the module form the rack and we confirmed that the first card had a very strong smell of burnt but we couldn’t individuate the broken component (we coudn't remove the card from the module to check the bottom part). We disconnected the card from the alimentation and reconnect again the AI module to the power supply. No saturation occurred since then. We will consider how to replace it. 

Note that ADC channel 11 even if is not connect to the broken card shows a strange feature (see pic 3). This channel is now used to acquire OPLEV INPUT SUM and it is not used in any control loop but the problem should be investigated.

Images attached to this report
2093_20200611115855_ai1.jpeg 2093_20200611115902_ai2.jpeg 2093_20200611115914_ai3.jpeg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 13:18, Wednesday 10 June 2020 (2091)Get code to link to this report
Measurement of FDS with additional Faraday isolator on 20200602

Yuhang, Eleonora

Last week we re-measured FDS with the new Faraday isolator.

The cavity was very well aligned (both in IR and green), mirror motion was small, but we could not go below shot noise at low frequency.

The squeezing at high frequency is 2.5dB (1dB less than usual). We suspect the Faraday is introducing more losses than we expected(elog 2055).

The back scattering seems quite low but we suspect that this is due to the low motion of suspended mirrors and not to the FI. In fact, in a previous measurement we observed high back scattering also with the new Faraday isolator(elog 2069).

Images attached to this report
2091_20200610061804_figure1.png
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 19:01, Wednesday 03 June 2020 (2090)Get code to link to this report
Lock trial

Today I tried to lock the laser to the folded cavity with SR560 and succeeded to do that though it lasted about 10 sec.

In addition, I estimated the finesse from the linewidth of transmitted beam.
First, I measured the cavity length with a ruler and it was about 82 mm.
Then I scanned the laser frequency and measured the linewidth of the transmitted beam.

The free spectral range can be estimated as
f_FSR = 3e8/(2*83e-3)=1.8*109 Hz.
And the linewidth was about 1.4*105 Hz.
Therefore, the finesse can be calculated as F = 1.3*104.

Images attached to this report
2090_20200603120043_20200603cavity.jpeg 2090_20200603120051_20200603lock.jpg
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 19:48, Monday 01 June 2020 (2089)Get code to link to this report
Alignment with folded geometry

Today I tried to align a cavity with folded geometry as shown in the picture.
The cavity has asymmetric cavity length where the longer one is about 60 mm and the shorter is 15 mm.

Eventually I could see the transmitted flash as attached picture.
Therefore, it may be possible to lock the cavity with a folding mirror though I have not checked the finesse nor transmitted power.

Tomorrow I will estimate the finesse with folded geometry and try to lock the laser using the servo.

Images attached to this report
2089_20200601124828_20200601cavity.jpg 2089_20200601124834_20200601.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 17:28, Monday 01 June 2020 (2088)Get code to link to this report
GR phase shifter successfully replaced

Takahashi-san, Yuhang, Eleonora

With the help of Takahashi-san we assembled the new GR phase shifter by gluing PZT and mirror on the new mount.

The GR mirror spec are shown in pic 1.

We used a glue (norland optical adhesive 61 in pic 2) that cured by 10 min exporsure to UV lamp (that lamp usually stored in 20 m lab, see manual in pic 3)

We soldered the new pzt connector(pic 5, green wire of PZT is positive) and replace the old phase shifter.

New alignment method for GRMC: since the new phase shifter doesn't have knobs to be adjusted, the alignment of GRMC now relies on the lens and one steering mirror between MZ and GRMC. Just as a memo, Yuhang moved lens position horizontally by hand. Besides, the alignment strongly depends on the voltage applied on pzt, so remember to turn on high voltage driver for green phase shifter before the lock of GRMC.

The CC1 TF (before and after replacment) is shown in pic 8. The phase noise measurement is shown in pic 6. The signal used to calibrate phase noise is shown in pic 7.

After the phase-shifter replacemnet the CC1 loop was much more stable and never got unlocked. There is 10dB attenuation for the error signal injected to the servo and the gain had to be reduced to the minimum.

Images attached to this report
2088_20200601102501_grmirr.jpeg 2088_20200601102509_glue.jpeg 2088_20200601102516_uvlamp.jpeg 2088_20200601102522_phaseshift.jpeg 2088_20200601104440_wechatimg666.jpeg 2088_20200601105118_newcc1phasenoise.png 2088_20200601105323_wechatimg667.jpeg 2088_20200601111525_comparison.png
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 16:23, Sunday 31 May 2020 (2087)Get code to link to this report
Confirmation with FP cavity

This entry is log on May 28.

As I could not align the cavity with folded geometry and see the transmitted light, I decided to play with FP geometry to confirm whether the fused silica mirrors are O.K. or not.
The cavity length was set to 6.4 cm.
Actually, I could see the transmitted beam easily.

After that, I estimated the finesse by scanning the laser frequency.
The measured value was about 1.46*104 where the designed value was 1.5*104.
Therefore, the fused silica mirrors seemed to be O.K.

Next step is to lock the laser to this FP cavity and then I will try with folded cavity with shorter cavity length.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 20:22, Wednesday 27 May 2020 (2086)Get code to link to this report
frequency independent squeezing recovery

Yuhang, Eleonora

We check the power at different points on the bench and compared with nominal values. We only had to realign IRMC. After re-alignment its trasmission is above 80% (much larger than GRMC)

Here the current values for reference:

GR power before green EOM 280mW
GR power before AOM 51 mW
GR power before MZ 220mW
GR power after AOM 16 mW
GR before GRMC 48 mW
GR after GRMC 93 mW
GR into the viewport 14mW
GR pump before entering OPO 19 mW
IR power before IRMC 2.2mW
IRMC transmission 1.8mW

Then we adjust the setup to measure FIS. We recovered the alignment of homodyne and measured the squeezing, finding values similar as before (~ 6 dB). Plots will be updated soon. We remarked that the CC1 loop is not stable and keeps unlocking. We plan to repace soon the GR phase shifter, hoping this will impove the situation.

We also checked the alignement of BAB into FC. It was still fairly good.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 22:16, Tuesday 26 May 2020 (2085)Get code to link to this report
System recovery (filter cavity locked again)

Eleonora and Yuhang

Today we revovered filter cavity aligment and lock.

What we did:

1. Erase data on the disk which was already full

2. Recover reference on BS chamber by moving last green steering mirror on bench.

3. Moving PR pitch picomotor around 300 steps (with velocity of 500) up.

4. The threshold of FC lock remote lock was wrong (maybe touched accidently by someone), we followed procedure described in elog1886 and recovered it. We found out the threshold was changed from -0.5V to around -1V. We recovered it back to -0.5V, in this case, the remote lock worked again.

5. The green transmission was around 2000 but we didn't check injected green power.

6. The air-conditioner was changed to cold mode (temperature was set to be 22 deg).

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 12:31, Sunday 26 April 2020 (2084)Get code to link to this report
Data disk full again: some data erased

The data disk was full and diaggui and similar were not working properly.

We cheked the status and deleted some old data with the procedure reported in entry #1979.

See attached the current situation of stored data.

Images attached to this report
2084_20200426053059_35.png