LOG-IN
Displaying reports 2261-2280 of 3274.Go to page Start 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 End
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 19:51, Friday 08 February 2019 (1208)Get code to link to this report
s-pol mismatching solved

Participant: Eleonora and Yuhang

As we said during the last filter cavity meeting, the matching of s-pol inside OPO is becoming worse. Today we checked again and found something different. Especially we checked the shape of the first higher order mode. And another important effect is the higher order mode becomes higher after moving screws for yaw. All of these prove that the higher order mode is because of yaw misalignment.

Then we aligned s-pol and also p-pol. The alignment condition is taken as a photo and attached. The first one is for s-pol and the second one for p-pol.

Images attached to this report
1208_20190208115028_wechatimg308.jpg 1208_20190208115034_wechatimg307.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 19:38, Wednesday 06 February 2019 (1207)Get code to link to this report
Locking both p pol PLL and CC PLL
 
[Aritomi, Eleonora, Yuhang, Matteo]
 
We finally succeeded in locking both p pol PLL and CC PLL.
The reason why we couldn't lock PLL so far was that some SMA cables were broken. 
 
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 18:58, Wednesday 06 February 2019 (1206)Get code to link to this report
Cables we need

0.5 m LEMO-SMA x 2

2 m SMA-SMA x 2

5 m LEMO-SMA x 2

Please check the cable before you use it !

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 17:20, Wednesday 06 February 2019 (1205)Get code to link to this report
Test of PLL servo box

Since we found that we cannot lock PLL, I did the test of PLL by sending signal inside and checking output signal.

The PLL servo box contains

Input local oscillator, beat note
output fast control, slow control, mux
function filter, integrator(switchable)

(Before doing test, we succeed in connecting computer and servo. We also succeeded in writing a desirable command to servo.)

 

Input signal:

1.Beat note: (1) 20MHz Sine wave with 100Hz frequency modulation, deviation of 1MHz. (2)20MHz Sine wave with 100Hz frequency modulation, deviation of 1kHz. (see attached figure 1 and 2)

2. Local oscillator: 20MHz from DDS board.

 

The purpose of using these two signals is to check how PLL acts when we have a "beat note" signal deviating from local oscillator. The result is as following:

1. Close the fast control loop. Sending beat note (1) and local oscillator. We check on oscilloscope and found it almost give just an offset of 10V. If we look at the AC of this signal, there is something(20mV) and the frequency is 100Hz. So it is sensing the difference between LO and BEAT.(see attached figure 3 and 4)

2. Open the fast control loop. Others are the same with rsult 1. We found almost nothing. So this means the small AC signal we get is because of the comparison of LO and BEAT.

3. We also tried to reduce the deviation. Close the loop and send beat note (2) and local oscillator. Then we got an AC signal without a clear frequency.

 

Conclusion: The PLL board has a problem. Actually we did the same test when Chienming was here. At that time, the signal we get from output channel is quite large.

Images attached to this report
1205_20190206091936_2449420449222702925520190206165213.jpg 1205_20190206091941_2449420449222702925520190206165523.jpg 1205_20190206093415_2449420449222702925520190206165501.jpg 1205_20190206093439_2449420449222702925520190206165510.jpg 1205_20190206093501_2449420449222702925520190206165231.jpg 1205_20190206093506_2449420449222702925520190206165239.jpg
General (General)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 17:03, Tuesday 05 February 2019 (1203)Get code to link to this report
Floor repaired in TAMA circuit prefab

Last Monday, the damaged part of the floor of TAMA circuit prefab (a.k.a elecshop) has been repaired.

In order to allow for the floor replacement we moved away everything in the interested area and we took the chance to do some cleaning.

We will put everything back in the next days and possibly tidy up a bit.

Images attached to this report
1203_20190205090242_elecshop2.jpg 1203_20190205090314_elecshop1.jpg 1203_20190205090320_elecshop3.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 11:46, Tuesday 05 February 2019 (1202)Get code to link to this report
PLL lock input signal magnitude measurement

local oscillator amplitude 16dBm(DDS3 CH0)

beat note amplitude (p pol-main laser before amplification) is -7dBm

beat note amplitude (s pol-main laser before amplification) is -10dBm

KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
MarcoBazzan - 19:54, Monday 04 February 2019 (1201)Get code to link to this report
Sapphire Namiki 1inch x 20mm
Members: Marco Bazzan, Manuel

P=32mW
We aligned the red probe with the surface reference sample.
Then we calibrated the bulk absorption.
Ac= 0.1V; DC=4.75V. T_ref=55%
R=0.1/4.75/0.032/sqrt(0.55)/1.04=0.85 cm/W

at 17:45 - Mounted the Namiki sapphire sample
Imaging unit position corrected for sample thickness by Delta_z = 8.6 mm
Rised the power to 1 W by rotating the IPC HWP
T_sapp=86%

Although noisy, we can observe an absorption profile by scanning the sample along z (see first screenshot). The profile is confirmed by flipping the sample (see second screenshot).

AC max = 250uV
DC=5V
Max absorption level estimate:

250/5/1/sqrt(0.86)/R*3.34 = 212 ppm/cm

Images attached to this report
1201_20190204115233_2019020413.png 1201_20190204115244_2019020414.png
Comments related to this report
MarcoBazzan - 16:55, Monday 18 February 2019 (1220)
After this measurements, the power was rised to 10.6 W on the sample and a set of measurements wee performed (scan XZ, YZ, XY top, XY bottom).

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 18:44, Monday 04 February 2019 (1200)Get code to link to this report
PLL fiber coupling
 
[Aritomi, Yuhang, Marco]
 
Here is the summary of PLL fiber coupling now.
 
ML-AUX1: 3 mW → 500 uW, coupling: 0.5*2/3 = 33%
ML-AUX2: 3.6 mW → 560uW, coupling: 0.56*2/3.6 = 31%
CC: 4 mW → 600 uW, coupling: 0.6*2/4 = 30%
p pol: 4.7 mW → 1.3 mW, coupling: 1.3*2/4.7= 55%
 
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 23:20, Friday 01 February 2019 (1199)Get code to link to this report
Re-alignment of fiber for PLL and fiber fluctuation
 
[Aritomi, Yuhang]
 
Today while working on coherent control PLL, the mirror for ML PLL shown in an attached figure moved because the clamp for this mirror was actually loose.
So we have to re-align the fibers for ML PLL.
Today we aligned only ML-p pol fiber. The result is as follows.
 
Before fiber: 3.7 mW
After fiber and fiber BS: 550 uW 
Fiber coupling: 0.55*2/3.7 = 30%
 
We'll align ML-CC fiber next week.
 
We also found that the output of the fiber for ML-CC PLL fluctuates a lot.
We'll investigate the reason of this fluctuation.
 
Today while working on coherent control PLL, the mirror for ML PLL shown in an attached figure moved because the clamp for this mirror was actually loose.
So we have to re-align the fibers for ML PLL.
Today we aligned only ML-p pol fiber. The result is as follows.
 
Before fiber: 3.7 mW
After fiber and fiber BS: 550 uW 
 
So the fiber coupling for ML-p pol is 0.55*2/3.7 = 30%.
We'll align ML-CC fiber next week.
 
We also found that the output of the fiber for ML-CC PLL fluctuates a lot.
We'll investigate the reason of this fluctuation.
Today while working on coherent control PLL, the mirror for ML PLL shown in an attached figure moved because the clamp for this mirror was actually loose.
So we have to re-align the fibers for ML PLL.
Today we aligned only ML-p pol fiber. The result is as follows.
 
Before fiber: 3.7 mW
After fiber and fiber BS: 550 uW 
 
So the fiber coupling for ML-p pol is 0.55*2/3.7 = 30%.
We'll align ML-CC fiber next week.
 
We also found that the output of the fiber for ML-CC PLL fluctuates a lot.
We'll investigate the reason of this fluctuation.
Images attached to this report
1199_20190201152035_18.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 18:11, Friday 01 February 2019 (1198)Get code to link to this report
Replace of fiber splitter

We found the fiber for ppol-mainlaser PLL (FC1064-50B-FC) was broken. We replaced it by a new one (PN1064R5F2).

Images attached to this report
1198_20190201101327_2449420449222702925520190201181241.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 10:52, Tuesday 29 January 2019 (1197)Get code to link to this report
Locking procedure of coherent control
 
[Aritomi, Yuhang, Matteo]
 
1. lock ML and cc with 7 MHz
2. make resonant frequency of p pol and cc overlap inside OPO
3. measure the beat note between ML and p pol (assume f MHz)
4. lock ML and p pol with f +/- 7 MHz
5. lock OPO with p pol
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 10:41, Tuesday 29 January 2019 (1196)Get code to link to this report
Original position of flipping mirror for Bright Alignment Beam

Attached picture shows micrometer of  flipping mirror for BAB when BAB is aligned to OPO.

Images attached to this report
1196_20190129024107_babmicrometer.jpg 1196_20190129024120_00.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 19:06, Monday 28 January 2019 (1195)Get code to link to this report
Fiber coupling for coherent control PLL

[Aritomi, Yuhang, Matteo]

Before fiber collimator: 4mW
After fiber collimator and fiber BS: 0.5mW
So the fiber coupling for coherent control is 0.5*2/4 = 25% 
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 18:28, Monday 28 January 2019 (1194)Get code to link to this report
500MHz oscillator now provides four clock signals

[Matteo, Eleonora]

Last Friday we have modified the 500MHz oscillator (realized by Pierre) to make it provide two more channels (four in total).

We have simply replaced the two channel splitter inside (pic1) with a four channel splitter (pic 2-3) and modified the front pannel accordingly (pic4).

Now we can supply the 500MHz clock signal to all the three DDS boards we have. 

Images attached to this report
1194_20190128102653_d282a57012f34386a760de3e8ae863c81.jpg 1194_20190128102725_11968ef4eed4449bb94a87f8a7440325.jpg 1194_20190128102738_7c66686996eb4d08b2ecc0529825810e.jpg 1194_20190128102753_0f51512255754af79159ff11ec952de6.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 18:20, Monday 28 January 2019 (1193)Get code to link to this report
Installation of KAGRA DGS

Last Thursday and Friday Oshino-san and Miyakawa-san have installed a standalone version of the KAGRA digital sytem in TAMA.

The rack with PC, DAC, ADC and AI and AA filters is placed in the South-East corner of the central building, beside the desks. 

Even if some more work is still necessary and the installation will be completed in the next days,  we can already start to build our similink model.

More details on the system will follow. 

One important caveat: every time that we switch off the computer on the rack (Pic1) we should also disconnect the cables on the back (Pic 2) before switching it on again. 

Images attached to this report
1193_20190128101832_28e1a8c0acf5455fb45d0496a4dffdd3.jpg 1193_20190128101840_cables.jpg 1193_20190128101849_096e54a6028c4946864b1b77501c0ee8.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 17:11, Monday 28 January 2019 (1192)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Additional DDS board assembled (Click here to view original report: 1181)
DDS1
channel function frequency phase
CH0 EOM SHG/IR-MC 15.2MHz 0deg
CH1 SHG + IR-MC demod 15.2MHz 0deg
CH2 EOM OPO 87.6MHz 0deg
CH3 OPO demod 87.6MHz 135deg
DDS2
channel function frequency phase
CH0 EOM FC/GR-MC 78.0MHz 0deg
CH1 FC demod 78.0MHz ~
CH2 GR-MC demod 78.0MHz 60 deg
CH3      
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 18:38, Thursday 24 January 2019 (1191)Get code to link to this report
Squeezing at lower frequency
 
[Aritomi, Eleonora, Matteo]
 
We measured squeezing level at lower frequency. Injected green is 47 mW.
Attached figures show squeezing level at 100 kHz, 10 kHz, 5 kHz.
 
squeezing: 3 dB, anti-squeezing: 9 dB @ 100 kHz 
squeezing: 2 dB, anti-squeezing: 5 dB @   10 kHz
squeezing: 0 dB, anti-squeezing: 6 dB @     5 kHz 
 
Note that a spectrum analyzer we used (E4411B ESA-L) works above 9 kHz, so the result for 5 kHz could be wrong.
 
Images attached to this report
1191_20190124114229_100khz.jpg 1191_20190124114237_10khz.jpg 1191_20190124114243_5khz.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 19:55, Wednesday 23 January 2019 (1190)Get code to link to this report
Characterization of all the RF amplification channels

As entitled.

CHANNEL NAME AMPLIFICATION
AOM FC 37.3dB
EOM SHG+MCIR 20.8dB
EOM FC+MCGR.  20.8dB
EOM OPO 20.9dB
DEMOD SHG 13.6dB
DEMOD MCIR 13.5dB
DEMOD FC 13.6dB
DEMOD MCGR 13.7dB
DEMOD OPO 13.7dB
DEMOD CC 14.1dB
PLL OPO lenght 18.8dB
PLL CC 18.7dB

Labels with the amplification values have been applied to all the channels.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 19:49, Wednesday 23 January 2019 (1188)Get code to link to this report
Measurement of first squeezing
 
[Aritomi, Eleonora, Matteo, Yuhang]
 
Today we measured first squeezing at 200 kHz.
 
Attached figure shows time series of shot noise of LO at 200 kHz with and without squeezing.
Shot noise level with squeezing modulates when relative phase between LO and squeezing is modulated.
Measured squeezing level is about 4 dB and anti squeezing level is about 5 dB. 
 
Detail:
First we recovered mode matching of LO and BAB inside AMC. For LO, main peak is 2.24V and mode mismatch peak is 24mV, so mode matching is 2.24/(2.24+0.024) = 98.9%.
For BAB, main peak is 336mV and mode mismatch peak is 17.6mV, so mode matching is 336/(336+17.6) = 95%.
 
Then we measured visibility of LO and BAB. Maximum is 7.56 V and minimum is 1.56 V which means visibility is 65.8%.
Considering that LO is 528uW and BAB is 78 uW, the expected visibility is 67.0%. That means mode matching of LO and BAB is 98.2 %.
 
For measurement of squeezing, we injected 30mW green power into OPO which corresponds to 1/3 of OPO threshold. LO phase is modulated at 2 Hz with 900 mVpp.
The homodyne signal is amplified by 200. The data is taken by spectrum analyzer (E4411B ESA-L) with zero span mode whose center frequency is 200kHz, RBW is 1 kHz, sweep time is 2s.
 
Next steps:
- loss analysis of the system
- check the stability of the control systems
- measure the squeezing level at lower frequency 
- measure green power dependence of squeezing level
- coherent control
 
First we recovered mode matching of LO and BAB inside AMC. For LO, main peak is 2.24V and mode mismatch peak is 24mV, so mode matching is 2.24/(2.24+0.024) = 98.9%.
For BAB, main peak is 336mV and mode mismatch peak is 17.6mV, so mode matching is 336/(336+17.6) = 95%.
Today we measured first squeezing at 200 kHz.
Attached figure shows shot noise of LO with and without squeezing.
Shot noise level with squeezing modulates when relative phase between LO and green pump is modulated.
Squeezing level is about 4 dB and anti squeezing level is about 6 dB. 
 
Detail:
First we recovered mode matching of LO and BAB inside AMC. For LO, main peak is 2.24V and mode mismatch peak is 24mV, so mode matching is 2.24/(2.24+0.024) = 98.9%.
For BAB, main peak is 336mV and mode mismatch peak is 17.6mV, so mode matching is 336/(336+17.6) = 95%.
 
Then we measured visibility of LO and BAB. Maximum is 7.56 V and minimum is 1.56 V which means visibility is 65.8%. Considering that LO is 528uW and BAB is 78 uW, the expected visibility is 67.0%. That means mode matching of LO and BAB is 98.2 %.
 
For measurement of squeezing, we injected 30mW green power into OPO. LO phase is modulated at 2 Hz with 900 mVpp. The data is taken by spectrum analyzer with zero span mode whose center frequency is 200kHz, RBW is 1 kHz, sweep time is 2s.
 
Next step:
loss analysis of the system
check the stability of the control system
measure the squeezing level at lower frequency 
measure green power dependence of squeezing level
Images attached to this report
1188_20190124052004_sqz230119.png
KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
ManuelMarchio - 19:04, Wednesday 23 January 2019 (1187)Get code to link to this report
Laser demo replacement

The new laser Thorlabs S1FC1310PM was delivered today together with the optical fiber.
I replaced the demo laser with the new laser. (the demo laser was the same model).
I switched it on, it works, and the alignment looks fine.

The demo is ready to be shipped back to Thorlabs.

Images attached to this report
1187_20190123110443_28.jpg 1187_20190123110455_281.jpg