NAOJ GW Elog Logbook 3.2

Considering the beam after the 1st telescope (after the FI), with characteristics of w0=403.3um at 792.4mm after the telsecope --> Fig 1.
We need to fit 2 EOM with aperture 2mm diameter, and around 100mm width.
For 2 EOM, this space is 200 mm. Considering the space to mount them 250 mm is reserved
With a polarizer and the photodiode, the total space should be around 350mm.
The photodiode has aperture of 500 um diameter.
The beam should be hence, around 500/2/2 um = 125 um, radius. It was not possible to have lower beam waist with available lens. A lens of -200 mm focal length can perhaps help us do this.
The telescope was designed using Jammt. The Fig 2 shows the expected beam characteristics.
The first lens F=-100mm, is kept at roughly 140 mm after the initial telescope. The 2nd lens F=100mm is kept at 180 mm. There is a label on table after the 1st telescope defining the 0th position .
After that QWP and HWP are installed to make linear polarization. They are at 200-220 mm.
The EOM is kept at 400-500 mm at 45degree for characterization.
The beam characteristics after the 2nd telescope is shown, in Fig 2.

In order to properly connect to the SLM through the DVI cable we somehow need the usb controller vi.
It allows to select which output we want to use (usb/dvi).
If connection is properly made, the vi can read the SLM and controller temperature.

As we have transformed the previous TAMA storage into a now operational lab space we can now restart the PCI activities.
I've reconnected all required cables, restarted lockin, chopper and laser controllers.
Somehow, the COM port of the translation stage changed from COM6 to COM7.
I've re-set up it on this new COM port (baud rate 9600) with same settings as previously used.
I home the translation stage after moving it by hand outside of the optical components.

The impedance matching with EOM is now done using a 50ohm transformer, T-626-X65+. I am not using the opamp anymore, since we can't use upto 10Vp-p from moku (amplitude 5V).
The L = 13.6mH, and with EOM around 12pF, the resonant frequency for ideal circuit is around 0.39MHz.
The circuit was supplied 10vp-p with moku and the spectrum of PD was read using moku. From the measurement it seems the resonant frequency is around 0.335MHz.
Fig 1: Spectrum of PD with laser off, and eom voltage off
Fig 2: Specturm of PD with laser on, eom voltage off
Fig 3: Spectrum of PD with laser on, eom voltage on.
Zoomed around the resonant freq to have better resolution of the peak. Then averaged 20 frames.
Fig 4: Spectrum of PD with laser off, and eom voltage off
Fig 5: Specturm of PD with laser on, eom voltage off
Fig 6: Spectrum of PD with laser on, eom voltage on.

[Frederic, Marc]
The SLM came with a CD containing installation software, manual and correction masks.
They are saved in dropbox and NAS in 'SLM' folder.
Note that the correct installation file is not the x64 one.
In order to properly connect to the SLM through the DVI cable we somehow need the usb controller vi.
It allows to select which output we want to use (usb/dvi).
If connection is properly made, the vi can read the SLM and controller temperature.

Katsuki, Yanada, Taki, Shalika
di-phenyl-di-peg(YI044)
C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\Cell Birefringence\Measurement data\Thu, Jan 30, 2025 4-51-15 PM.txt
C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\Cell Birefringence\Measurement data\Thu, Jan 30, 2025 5-18-49 PM.txt
input measument:
C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\Cell Birefringence\Measurement data\Thu, Jan 30, 2025 5-52-07 PM.txt

I replaced the broken DRY pump (DSP500) with new one (NeoDry30G) for theTMP in the south end yesterday. The TMP is running with the DRY pump now.

There was a use of positive sign convention at some places in the script instead of negative one. So, the plots of linear birefringence are updated as

I also reversed the plots to Stress vs. birefringence for better visualization.
Formula 1: Arylamide (There was a slight issue of this hydrogel slipping during measurement end)
Fig 1: Stress vs Retardation
Fig 2: Stress vs. Diattenuation
Formula 2: Di-phenyl
Fig 3: Stress vs Retardation
Fig 4: Stress vs. Diattenuation

The plots obtained after analysis for birefringence vs. stress.
Formula 1: Arylamide (There was a slight issue of this hydrogel slipping during measurement end)
Fig 1: Retardation vs. Stress
Fig 2: Diattenuation vs. Stress
Formula 2: Di-phenyl
Fig 3: Retardation vs. Stress
Fig 4: Diattenuation vs. Stress

Katsuki, Shalika
We note down the value of change in width as well, from now on. This will impropve the stress estimation. The width mesaured is in last but one column and the force measured is in last column. The uncertainity on force is 0.01N, and 0.1mm on width and thickness. The measurement on width and thickness was done using vernier caliper. The thickness was the same all the time.
input_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\Cell Birefringence\Measurement data\Tue, Jan 21, 2025 9-55-00 AM.txt
Two formulas of hydrogel were measured.
hydrogel 1 (arylamide,1.5 mm, 25 mm )
output_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\Cell Birefringence\Measurement data\Tue, Jan 21, 2025 10-18-53 AM.txt
hydrogel 2 (di-phenyl(YY037), 1.5 mm, 25 mm)
output_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\Cell Birefringence\Measurement data\Tue, Jan 21, 2025 11-32-51 AM.txt
The plots obtained after analysis for birefringence vs. stress.
Formula 1: Arylamide (There was a slight issue of this hydrogel slipping during measurement end)
Fig 1: Retardation vs. Stress
Fig 2: Diattenuation vs. Stress
Formula 2: Di-phenyl
Fig 3: Retardation vs. Stress
Fig 4: Diattenuation vs. Stress
I also reversed the plots to Stress vs. birefringence for better visualization.
Formula 1: Arylamide (There was a slight issue of this hydrogel slipping during measurement end)
Fig 1: Stress vs Retardation
Fig 2: Stress vs. Diattenuation
Formula 2: Di-phenyl
Fig 3: Stress vs Retardation
Fig 4: Stress vs. Diattenuation
There was a use of positive sign convention at some places in the script instead of negative one. So, the plots of linear birefringence are updated as

I have replaced the part which calculates the mean, with the statistics.vi to get median instead.

In "Complete Integration- Dual Step.vi" I have added a place to add 2 extra columns, for some additional data saving as comments. Comments column will still be there if needed. We can save down the value of force and stress during measurement.
I have replaced the part which calculates the mean, with the statistics.vi to get median instead.

Previous 30mm diameter sample holder induced large stress due to mounting screw that was messing up the birefringence mapping.
After few iterations, the updated holder design seems reasonable and will be 3D printed tomorrow.
All the parts are saved in Dropbox and NAS folder 'mount and holder'
It should be possible to install all samples (ie with length 10,15,20,50,60,70 mm length).

0.5-3V with 0.15V step
input_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Tue, Jan 14, 2025 10-00-53 PM.txt
output_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Tue, Jan 14, 2025 11-31-23 AM.txt

Pol states for Sapphire measurements
0-3.5V with 0.1V step, 100 avg (previous setting)
input_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Mon, Jan 13, 2025 12-44-19 PM.txt
output_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Tue, Jan 14, 2025 8-04-23 AM.txt
0.5-3V with 0.25V step
input_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Mon, Jan 13, 2025 3-59-32 PM.txt
output_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Mon, Jan 13, 2025 4-34-12 PM.txt
0.5-3V with 0.15V step
input_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Tue, Jan 14, 2025 10-00-53 PM.txt
output_filename = C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\LC-Experiment\Measurement Data\Tue, Jan 14, 2025 11-31-23 AM.txt

The analysis of the results give the following results.
Find the plot here: C:\Users\atama\Dropbox\Cell Birefringence\Measurement data\hydrogel\New bis-phenyl-1O 1.5 mm

On the eom path, made the laser linear using HWP and QWP (±0.01º). This was measured using polcam. The polcam was then removed. The power after this stage was 1.44mW.
Then aligned PD on the transmission path.
Then added polarizer infront of PD and the setup was configured to be in cross polarization configuration.
The characterization will be done using PD because the polcam can't see kHz modulation.
The test is being done to check how much modulation can be provided by the circuit.

The aperture of EOM is 2mm diameter. So, the beam radius should be smaller than 1mm.
The power density requirement is <4W/mm2.
The current beam characteristics are shown using lens F=100 in Fig 1 and F=50, -50 mm in Fig 2. from elog 3754
If we keep input power of around 1.5mW, both of the lens system would be fine to implement.
The 100 mm lens was kept at 101.5cm.
Tbh I didn't quite understand why the 100 mm lens was removed (in elog 3563). From the beam characteristics it seems we can achieve the requirement on both power density and beam size using one lens and in less space. I feel its much better to use less lens and keep stuff in compact space, unless there is some reasonable issue that needs to be taken into account. If the space is compact we can fit both EOM in reasonable space, without consuming the entire length of the table.
In Fig 3 I have added position for both EOM and the required lens for it.(will add the plot in a shortwhile)

The laser was tested to see if it can be switched on or is dead (the asset label says 1996). Apparently it's not dead. It's on bigfoot table now, and is intended to be used.